Case Law Details
Case Name : Alugaddala Kistaiah Pandu Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Hyderabad
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Alugaddala Kistaiah Pandu Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Conclusion: The property was conveyed to assessee after the death of his father in 1955, i.e. before coming into force of Hindu Succession Act, 1950. Accordingly, the property belonged to HUF of assessee and not to assessee-individual. Therefore, the assessment order passed under section 147 for difference in sale consideration and fair market value of property itself was liable to be quashed.
Held: AO had received information that assessee-individual had sold property for a consideration of Rs.32,21,000/- during the financial year relevant to ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

