This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Deduction u/s 35(2AB) of pre-amended period allowed without issue of form No. 3CL from DSIR
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Omni Active Health Technologies Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2014-15
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Omni Active Health Technologies Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
The issue under consideration is whether the deduction u/s 35(2AB) towards research and development expenditure claimed by assessee is justified in law?
In present case, the assessee claimed deduction u/s 35(2AB) being 200% of amount incurred towards scientific research. The perusal of approvals from DSIR in Form No.3CM and working of deduction u/s 35(2AB) as per return of income and as per Form No. 3CL reflected difference of Rs.10.54 Lacs. Accordingly, the same was disallowed and added to the income of the assessee.
I...
Author Info
