Income Tax : Understand the statutory time limits for filings, applications, approvals, and settlement processes under the Income-tax Act, incl...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the contested issue of time-barred GST appeals. While some courts deny interference, a recent Calcutta High Court ruling c...
Income Tax : Profits and Gains of Business or Profession (PGBP) Additions and Deductions Following things should be added to ‘Net Profit as p...
Income Tax : Provisions of section 35 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 covers deduction allowable towards expenditure on scientific research. The pr...
Income Tax : The Finance Act 2020 has brought in some dynamic changes in respect of the exempted Trusts, Societies, NGOs, Charitable Trusts, Se...
Corporate Law : Explore the proposed amendments to Regulations 35, 37, and 50 of the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations 2009. L...
Income Tax : Deferrement of Procedure for Approval/ Registration/Notifications of certain entities U/s 10(23C), 12AA, 35 & 80G of Incom...
Income Tax : A plain reading of Section 35(2AB) of the Act may suggest that the weighted deduction is not with respect to expenditure on scient...
Income Tax : Section 35 of the Income-tax Act provides for deduction in respect of expenditure on research and development. The existing provis...
Corporate Law : The Tribunal allowed recovery of ₹10.74 lakh after the borrower defaulted on a car loan and failed to appear in the proceedings....
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that once the Assessing Officer scrutinized the Section 10AA claim and R&D allocation, revision cannot be invok...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that capital gains must be computed using the final stamp value determined after litigation, not an earlier infl...
Income Tax : The issue was whether a late return under section 139(4) bars the concessional 22% tax regime. The Tribunal held that timely filin...
Income Tax : The Court ruled that Section 17A lawfully requires prior approval before investigating decisions taken in official capacity. It cl...
Income Tax : The Ministry of Finance grants approval to IIIT Hyderabad for scientific research under the Income Tax Act, effective from 2024-25...
Income Tax : Notification 102/2024 designates Auroville Foundation as an approved institution for social science research under the Income Tax ...
Corporate Law : Discover the implications as the provisions of sections 20, 35, and 40 of the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2023 take effect from M...
Income Tax : CBDT has decided that the implementation of new procedure for approval/ registration/notification of certain entities shall be def...
Fema / RBI : UBD.BPD (PCB).Cir No.25/09.11.200/2009-10 Dated - December 3, 2009 The Government had in exercise of powers conferred by Section 3...
The Tribunal allowed recovery of ₹10.74 lakh after the borrower defaulted on a car loan and failed to appear in the proceedings. The bank’s documentary evidence remained unrebutted.
The Tribunal ruled that once the Assessing Officer scrutinized the Section 10AA claim and R&D allocation, revision cannot be invoked. Section 263 cannot be used to re-examine issues already verified during assessment.
The Tribunal held that capital gains must be computed using the final stamp value determined after litigation, not an earlier inflated valuation, and directed deletion of the resulting addition.
The issue was whether a late return under section 139(4) bars the concessional 22% tax regime. The Tribunal held that timely filing of Form 10IC is sufficient and the benefit cannot be denied on technical grounds.
The Court ruled that Section 17A lawfully requires prior approval before investigating decisions taken in official capacity. It clarified that the provision balances anti-corruption enforcement with protection against vexatious probes.
Delhi High Court held that the Initiating Officer has given reasons to believe as to how petitioner is a Benamidar. Further, writ is not admitted as petitioner has an efficacious remedy before Adjudicating Officer under Section 26 of the Benami Act.
The issue was whether revision under section 263 was valid for multiple expense claims. The Tribunal held that since the Assessing Officer had examined issues and adopted a plausible view, revision was unsustainable.
The issue was whether delayed employees’ PF/ESI contributions paid before filing the return could be allowed. The Tribunal held that the Supreme Court’s interpretation in Checkmate Services is declaratory and applies to earlier years, mandating disallowance.
The court ruled that insisting on a flat 20% deposit to grant stay is illegal, holding that authorities must exercise discretion under Section 220(6) after considering merits and hardship.
The Tribunal held that deductions for donations cannot be denied due to later retrospective withdrawal of approval. Genuine donations made when the donee was approved retain tax benefits.
