This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Reassessment Notices Invalid as Faceless Procedure Was Not Followed: Madras HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Mark Studio India Private Limited Vs ITO (Madras High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Madras High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Mark Studio India Private Limited Vs ITO (Madras High Court)
The Madras High Court allowed the appeal and quashed notices issued under Sections 148A and 148 of the Income Tax Act on the ground that they were issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer instead of the Faceless Assessing Officer. The learned Single Judge had earlier dismissed the petition holding that such notices would remain valid even if issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer. Before the Division Bench, the appellant relied on several decisions following the Bombay High Court ruling in Hexaware Tech...





