Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anup Kumar Aggarwal Vs ACIT (Central) (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anup Kumar Aggarwal Vs ACIT (Central) (ITAT Rajkot) Extrapolation of Unrecorded Sales Without Incriminating Material Invalid: ITAT Chandigarh Deletes ₹60.42 Lakh Addition for AY 2022-23 The Chandigarh ‘B’ Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench allowed the appeal of Shri Anup Kumar Aggarwal for AY 2022-23 and deleted the addition of ₹60.42 lakh made towards alleged unaccounted sales. The assessee, proprietor of M/s HB Foods, was subjected to a search on 04.11.2022. While certain unrecorded sales were allegedly found for AY 2023-24, no incriminating material whatsoe...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031