This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Deemed Dividend Not Attracted Because Advances Arose from Genuine Commercial Transactions
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- DCIT Vs Prestige Holiday Resorts Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2015-16
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
DCIT Vs Prestige Holiday Resorts Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai adjudicated multiple appeals filed by the Revenue for Assessment Years (AY) 2015–16 and 2016–17, along with cross-objections filed by the assessee. The disputes related to deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e), disallowance of commission expenses, depreciation on capitalised timeshare weeks, foreign travel expenses, and the validity of assessment orders passed in the name of a non-existing entity.
Deemed Dividend under Section 2(22)(e):The Revenue challenged the...
Author Info
