Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Luminous Power Technologies Private Ltd. Vs Deputy Director of Income Tax (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Luminous Power Technologies Private Ltd. Vs Deputy Director of Income Tax (ITAT Delhi) Technical? No — Mandatory – One-Month Rule is Absolute-. Delay Under 144C(13) Is Fatal- ITAT Quashes Delayed DRP Final Orders as Time-Barred Delhi Tribunal examined whether the Final Assessment Orders u/s 143(3) r.w.s.144C(13) were passed within the statutory time limit. Assessee pointed out that DRP issued directions on 04.03.2022 & therefore AO was mandatorily required u/s 144C(13) to pass the final order within one month from end of month of receipt, i.e., on or before 30.04.2022. However, AO ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031