Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anand Kumar Chaurasia Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anand Kumar Chaurasia Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Diamond Sale Genuine: Delhi ITAT Deletes ₹82.67 Cr u/s 68 & ₹14.88 Lakh u/s 69C; Protective Jewellery Addition Also Dismissed Assessee filed ROI declaring income of Rs.87.30 crore, including LTCG of Rs.76.18 crore on sale of diamonds. Assessment u/s 143(3) (post-search centralisation) derecognised the LTCG, treated sale consideration of Rs.82,67,44,250 as unexplained cash credit u/s 68, disallowed alleged commission of Rs.14,88,140 u/s 69C, &  made a protective addition of Rs.2,05,13,134 towards unexplained jewellery. CIT(A) upheld additi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031