Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ajay Pal Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ajay Pal Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) VRS Revision Done Under Wrong Belief: Delhi ITAT Deletes 270A Penalty in Full-  Honest Mistake, No Revenue Loss: ITAT Delhi Quashes 270A Penalty for VRS Recipient Assessee, a salaried employee of Honda, filed original return declaring Rs.43,88,320 which matched Form 16. Later, believing that VRS benefits were exempt, Assessee filed a revised return declaring Rs.31,26,700. Case was selected for scrutiny on “excess refund sought”. During assessment, Assessee failed to justify reduction in income. AO noted that revised income was lower than employer’s For...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Recall Without Sufficient Cause: Tribunal Rejects Bid to Set Aside Ex-Parte Benami Orders HC Flags “Catch-22” in TDS Prosecution; Directs Liquidator to Act, Grants Limited Protection HC Quashes 148A(d) & Ex-Parte Assessment; Matter Restored to 148A(b) Stage for Fresh Reply Karnataka HC Sets Aside 154 Rectification; Remands for Fresh Consideration of Sec 54 Claim on CGAS Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930