Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Duphar Interfran Ltd. Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Duphar Interfran Ltd. Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court) Bombay High Court held that Brand Acquisition Agreement in respect of trademark –‘Crocin’ between parties is an agreement to Sale and such sale is not a sale within the State of Maharashtra hence not liable to sales tax @4% under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Facts- The present petition has been preferred by the petitioner. It is mainly contested that Tribunal was not justified in law in holding that the Brand Acquisition Agreement dated 18/01/1996 in respect of trademark ‘Crocin’ entered into by M/s. Duphar Interfran L...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930