This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Brand Acquisition Agreement of trademark –‘Crocin’ is export and doesn’t qualify as local sales
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Duphar Interfran Ltd. Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Duphar Interfran Ltd. Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court)
Bombay High Court held that Brand Acquisition Agreement in respect of trademark –‘Crocin’ between parties is an agreement to Sale and such sale is not a sale within the State of Maharashtra hence not liable to sales tax @4% under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.
Facts- The present petition has been preferred by the petitioner. It is mainly contested that Tribunal was not justified in law in holding that the Brand Acquisition Agreement dated 18/01/1996 in respect of trademark ‘Crocin’ entered into by M/s. Duphar Interfran L...
Author Info
