Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : S. R. Constructions Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
S. R. Constructions Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Search-Based Additions Cannot Rest Solely on 132(4) Statements—ITAT Deletes Bogus Sub-Contractor Additions; Affidavits, RA Bills & Unrebutted Evidence Prevail The appeals filed by S.R. Constructions and the cross-appeals by the Revenue arose from assessments completed u/s 153A pursuant to a search conducted on 23-11-2016 at the Ananthapur & Bangalore offices. The AO treated substantial payments to 27 sub-contractors as bogus expenditure, relying almost entirely on statements recorded u/s 132(4), the presence of certain signed/unsigned cheq...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031