The authority held that complaint-related submissions received from Insolvency Professionals are held in fiduciary capacity and exempt under Section 8(1)(e). The ruling reiterates that RTI cannot be used to obtain confidential regulatory material.
The ROC held that failure to reflect authorised capital alteration in every copy of the Memorandum violated Section 15(1), resulting in a penalty on the company and its directors. The ruling reinforces strict compliance with documentation updates.
The Department of Posts introduces a Standard Operating Procedure to correct balance differences in POSA, PPF, and SSA accounts caused by non-migrated pre-CBS transactions.
ROC Ahmedabad imposes penalties for delayed appointment of independent directors, noting 81 days of non-compliance and directing payment under Section 172.
ROC Ahmedabad imposes penalties for failure to include registered office details on company letterheads for multiple years, citing violation of Section 12(8).
The IBBI held that details sought under RTI regarding Swastik Ispat Pvt. Ltd. were already hosted on its website, disposing of the appeal accordingly.
The ROC Ahmedabad penalized the company and its director for failing to appoint independent directors and constitute an audit committee within the mandated timeline. The order outlines the default period, penalty amounts, and compliance requirements.
The ROC Ahmedabad levied penalties for failing to appoint a Company Secretary within the required timeframe after capital increase triggered Section 203 compliance. The order details the 408-day delay and the imposed penalty amounts.
ROC Delhi levied penalties for not preparing and keeping minutes and attendance registers for seven board meetings, stressing the mandatory record-keeping requirements under Section 118.
The order holds directors liable for not providing mandatory interest disclosures in initial board meetings. Penalties were levied under Section 184(4) for procedural non-compliance.
