The adjudicating authority held that failing to fill the company secretary vacancy for over three years violated Section 203(5). Full penalties were imposed as the company was not eligible for reduced relief.
The ROC imposed penalties after finding that CSR funds meant for ongoing projects were wrongly spent and not transferred to Schedule VII funds. The key takeaway is that improper use of unspent CSR amounts triggers liability under Section 135(5).
The ROC Bengaluru imposed penalties for a 94-day delay in conducting the required board meeting, citing violation of Section 173(1). The order directs payment within 90 days and outlines the appeal process
The adjudicating authority held that failure to include an email ID on the company letterhead violated Section 12(3)(c), imposing reduced penalties due to small-company status.
Authorities imposed penalties after finding continued failure to file financial statements for FY 2019-20. The order directs rectification, personal payment by officers, and outlines appeal and compliance requirements.
ROC held that company failed to file financial statements for FY 2021-22 and imposed penalties on entity and its directors. Order directs rectification and payment within 90 days.
The ROC penalised the company and directors for not filing financial statements for FY 2020-21. The order highlights statutory penalties, compliance directives, and timelines for rectification.
RoC Kolkata levied penalties for failure to file FY 2018-19 financial statements, holding the company and directors liable under Section 137(3) of the Companies Act.
ROC Kolkata levies penalties for failure to file financial statements under Section 137(3), directing rectification and payment within prescribed timelines.
ROC Kolkata levies penalties for prolonged non-filing of financial statements, directing rectification and payment within statutory timelines.
