Follow Us:

Orders

ROC Bangalore imposes ₹3.96 Lakh Penalty for Holding Two DINs for 8 Years

February 9, 2026 495 Views 0 comment Print

The ROC Bangalore held that obtaining and retaining a second DIN in violation of Section 155 of the Companies Act attracts penalty under Section 159. Despite the error being inadvertent and later rectified, the prolonged default of 3075 days resulted in a reduced but substantial penalty.

ROC Bangalore imposes Penalty for Second DIN Held Inadvertently

February 9, 2026 342 Views 0 comment Print

The ROC Bangalore imposed penalty for holding two Director Identification Numbers in violation of Section 155 of the Companies Act, 2013. Even though the second DIN was obtained inadvertently and later surrendered, the continuing default for 1227 days attracted adjudication and monetary penalty.

RTI on Insolvency Proceedings Dismissed as Regulator Not Required to Create Records

February 9, 2026 333 Views 0 comment Print

Information linked to verification of resolution plans was held exempt due to fiduciary relationship, reinforcing limits on RTI disclosures.

RTI Cannot Be Used to Seek Confirmation of Correct CIRP Contact Person

February 9, 2026 276 Views 0 comment Print

The appellate authority held that RTI cannot be used to seek confirmations or opinions. Information already available in the public domain need not be recompiled by the regulator.

IBBI Appellate Authority Denied RTI as Subsidiary Not Part of Insolvency Process

February 9, 2026 267 Views 0 comment Print

The appellate authority held that information could not be disclosed since the subsidiary company was not admitted to insolvency proceedings. RTI access was limited to information held by the regulator.

ROC Kolkata Imposed Penalty for not attaching Valuation Report in PAS-3 Filing

February 9, 2026 393 Views 0 comment Print

The authority held that failure to attach a valuation report with Form PAS-3 violates Rule 12(7) of the PAS Rules. In the absence of a specific penalty, the residuary provision under Section 450 was applied, resulting in maximum penalties.

Failure to attach a valuation report with Form PAS-3: ROC Kolkata Imposes Penalty

February 9, 2026 747 Views 0 comment Print

Failure to attach a valuation report with Form PAS-3 was held to breach Rule 12(7). Since continuing penalties were already imposed earlier, only the minimum penalty was levied in this instance.

ROC Bangalore imposes Penalty for Physical Share Transfer Without Demat

February 9, 2026 1935 Views 0 comment Print

The order holds that delayed dematerialisation of securities violates Section 29(1A) and Rule 9A. The company and directors were penalised under the residuary provision for prolonged non-compliance.

ROC Bangalore imposes Heavy Penalties for 433-Day Delay in Filing e-Form INC-20A

February 9, 2026 471 Views 0 comment Print

Failure to file INC-20A within 180 days resulted in penalties on both the company and its directors. The order highlights strict enforcement of commencement of business provisions.

ROC Bangalore Penalised Directors & Company for 127-Day Delay in INC-20A Filing

February 9, 2026 429 Views 0 comment Print

The authority held directors personally liable for a prolonged default in commencement compliance. The case highlights that continuing defaults can result in maximum statutory penalties.

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031