In this context, we advise that a Committee was constituted by the Controller General of Accounts, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, to review the permissible period for transfer of funds to Government account in case of e-payment and other related issues. The Committee recommended that the remittance norm of T+1 working day (including put through date) for e-payment as applicable for Private Sector Banks may also be made applicable for the Public Sector Banks.
The other provisions, as specified in SEBI circular no. MRD/DoP/SE/Dep/Cir-14/2007 dated December 20, 2007 on “Short selling and securities lending and borrowing”, SEBI circular no. MRD/DoP/SE/Cir- 31/2008 dated October 31, 2008 on “Review of Securities Lending and Borrowing (SLB) Framework” and SEBI circular no SEBI/MRD/DoP/SE/Dep/Cir-01/2010 dated January 06, 2010 on “Review of Securities Lending and Borrowing (SLB) Framework” shall continue to be applicable.
However, in case the promoters fail to bring in their balance share of sacrifice within the extended time limit of one year, the asset classification benefits derived by banks in terms of para 14.2.2 of the above circular will cease to accrue and the banks will have to revert to classifying such accounts as per the asset classification norms specified under para 11.2 of our above circular.
Notification No. G.S.R. 820(E)-Income Tax In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (7) of section 245F of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Income-tax Settlement Commission hereby makes the following further amendments in the Income-tax Settlement Commission (Procedure) Rules, 1997
Section 205C of the Companies Act, 1956 – Establishment of Investor Education & Protection Fund – Constitution of a Committee in supersession of Notification No. S.O. 539(E), dated 25-2-2009. Notification No. S.O. 2435(E), dated 6-10-2010
G.S.R. (E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (5) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), read with rules 23 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, the Central Government hereby rescinds the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 46/2010-Customs, dated the 12th April,2010, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Sect
G.S.R. 817(E). – Whereas, the designated authority, vide its notification No. 15/9/2009-DGAD, dated 20th August,2009 published in Part I, Section 1 the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, dated the 21st August,2009, had initiated a review in the matter of continuation of anti-dumping on imports of Narrow woven fabrics having pile weave, made up of manmade fibres (also known as hook and loop tape fasteners or Velcro tapes or fastening tape) (hereinafter referred to as the subject goods) falling under heading 5806 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), originating in, or exported from, the People’s Republic of China and Chinese Taipei (hereinafter referred to as the subject cou
After the introduction of VAT, a large number of refund applications are being filed, as compared to the BST period. The department is undergoing transition due to which business processes have undergone many changes. As a result, a number of circulars were issued from time to time to lay down the procedure for the granting of refund,
Circular No. IRDA/F&I/CIR/AML/158/09/2010, dated 24-9-2010 Guidelines on Anti-Money laundering Guidelines issued under Section 34 of the Insurance Act, 1938 updated upto 31st October 2008 into a Master Circular bearing reference 022/IRDA/Master-AML/Nov-08-dated 24th November 2008 is now being updated with guidelines/circulars issued upto 31st July 2010. Pleas find the Master circular 2010 on the subject for […]
Circular No. IRDA/NL/CIR/159/09/2010, dated 27-9-2010 Following examination of credit insurance covers being marketed by general insurers to banks offering credit facilities to debtors, it is observed that such covers appear to be in the nature of credit default insurance. Therefore such covers necessarily need to have a different regulatory treatment. The Authority under the powers […]
