The equity shares of M/s. Surana Telecom and Power Limited (Target Company) are inter alia listed on BSE and NSE. 1.2 An application was made by the Promoter Group on 5-5-2008, for seeking exemption from the application of Regulation 11(1) of Takeover Code for increase in Promoter Group holding from 54.66% to 59.39% which is incidental to the buyback offer of M/s Surana Telecom and Power Limited (“Target Company”).
Notification No 36/2011 – Income Tax Income Tax department has last amended the 3CD report by inserting a New Clause 17A after Clause 17 by NOTIFICATION NO. 36/2009, DATED 13-4-2009 , which require auditors to report Amount of interest inadmissible under section 23 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006. In addition to that there were some changes in provisions of fringe benefit. I am attaching herewith a Revised Form 3CD for Tax Audit incorporating all the changes and amendments till 31st August 2011 and same is applicable for Assessment year 2009-2010, 2010-11 and 2011-12. Download Form 3CD in Excel Format
INSTRUCTION NO. 6/2011 [F.NO.187/12/2010-ITA-I], DATED 8-4-2011 Reference may kindly be made to Board’s Instruction No. 1/11, dated 31-1-2011 which lays down revised monetary limit of cases to be assessed by DCsIT/ACsIT in metro cities and mofussil areas w.e.f. 1-4-2011. Some CCsIT have expressed the view that the limits fixed in the aforesaid Instruction, if strictly enforced would lead to unequal distribution of workload between the ACITs and the ITOs in some of the charges
Notification No.29/2011 – Customs (N.T.) – Central Government hereby makes the following further amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 61/94-Customs (NT), dated the 21st November, 1994, namely: – (i) In the said notification, in the Table for serial number 6 relating to the state of Gujarat specified in column (1) and the entries relating thereto in columns (2) , (3) and (4), the following shall, respectively, be substituted, namely:-
The refunds against bank guarantee shall be granted any time for any period even after the due date of filing of audit form 704 is over. The condition of refund audit of previous period and major discrepancy will not be applicable in the bank guarantee cases. It may be noted that after granting the refund against bank guarantee, if the refund audit officer notices that the deafer Is avoiding/ delaying the process of refund audit then the concerned Joint Commissioner shall encash the bank guarantee submitted by the dealer Immediately.
RPCD.CO.RRB.BC No. 59/03.05.72/2010-11- A recent study undertaken by Regional Offices of NABARD and RBI in select States has revealed that compounding of interest on quarterly/ half-yearly basis, and not as per cropping/ harvesting cycle/s on agricultural loans, was prevalent in some RRBs. In certain cases, NABARD has also observed that RRBs have been using the software package developed by their sponsor banks, which has no provision for segregating interest from principal before applying the interest for the next period. Wherever manual accounting was involved, the compounding was observed in a few cases attributed to human error.
RPCD.CO.RRB.BC.No.59 /03.05.34 /2010-11 – On a review of the issue it has been decided that the exemption granted to RRBs up to financial year 2009-10 from ‘mark to market’ norms in respect of their investment in SLR securities be extended by for three years i.e. for the financial years 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13. Accordingly, RRBs will have the freedom to classify their entire investment portfolio of SLR securities under ‘Held to Maturity’ for the financial years 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13 with valuation on book value basis and amortization of premium, if any, over the remaining life of securities
Notification No. 3/2011 – Income Tax Central Government, on the recommendations of the National Committee for Promotion of Social and Economic Welfare, hereby notifies the institutions approved by the said National Committee, mentioned in column (2) of the Table below, and approves the eligible projects or schemes specified to be carried on by the said institutions and the estimated cost thereof as mentioned in column (3) of the said Table, and also specifies in the column (4) of the Table the maximum amount of such cost which may be allowed as deduction under the said section 35AC for the period of approval, namely:—
Notification No. 30/2011 – Customs (N.T.) – These rules may be called the Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback (Second Amendment) Rules, 2011. (2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette. 2. In the Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback Rules, 1995, in rule 16(A),-
The company required to get its cost records audited under section 233B (1) of the Companies Act, 1956 shall appoint a cost auditor who is a cost accountant as defined in clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959 (23 of 1959) and who holds a valid certificate of practice under sub-section (1) of section 6 of that Act and includes a firm of cost accountants.
