The issue involved reduction of RoDTEP benefits to 50% under an earlier notification. The government restored full rates for eligible exports. The key takeaway is that exporters will now receive benefits at pre-restriction levels.
Company held only three Board Meetings in a year, violating statutory norms. Officers were penalized individually for non-compliance with meeting requirements.
The issue involved obtaining more than one DIN in violation of statutory provisions. The authority imposed a reduced penalty, recognizing the error as unintentional and self-reported.
The issue involved duplication of DIN due to ignorance during incorporation. The authority imposed penalty despite voluntary disclosure, reinforcing strict compliance requirements.
Holding more than one DIN violates statutory provisions regardless of intent. The adjudicating authority imposed maximum penalty despite claim of inadvertent error.
Insight Instruction No. 90 identifies high-risk non-filers through advanced data matching tools. Officers are guided to verify and initiate action based on risk indicators.
The issue involved granting recognition to an institution for research purposes. The authority approved eligibility, allowing tax deductions for scientific research activities.
The case addresses failure to place a mandatory replacement agenda despite requisite voting share. The ruling emphasizes that statutory obligations under CIRP regulations are non-discretionary and must be strictly followed.
The government has appointed 22 Judicial Members as Vice Presidents of GSTAT benches. The move aims to improve efficiency and strengthen GST dispute resolution.
The issue involved whether clients could simultaneously receive advisory and distribution services. SEBI clarified that strict segregation is mandatory, ensuring no overlap to prevent conflicts of interest.
