Income Tax : Explore Section 80JJAA of Income Tax Act, encouraging job creation in India. Learn about conditions, deductions, and benefits for ...
Income Tax : Learn about Deduction u/s 80JJAA: Who's eligible, how much is allowed, and what it means for additional employee costs. Expert ins...
Income Tax : Learn about tax deductions for new employee costs under section 80JJAA of the Income-tax Act, its eligibility criteria, and practi...
Finance : A company opting for special rate taxation under section 115BAA and 115BAB of the Act are exempt from paying MAT. Further, a compa...
Income Tax : Explore Section 80JJA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, offering deductions for businesses engaged in collecting and processing biodegr...
Income Tax : During the course of the survey operation, evidences of tax evasion have been gathered regarding wrongful claims of deduction u/s ...
Goods and Services Tax : Currently, a deduction of 30% is allowed in addition to normal deduction of 100% in respect of emoluments paid to eligible new emp...
Income Tax : ITAT ruled that deduction under Section 80JJAA could not be claimed where the business was acquired through amalgamation. The Trib...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad held that deduction under Section 80JJAA cannot be denied merely because Form No. 10DA was filed late due to techni...
Income Tax : The case examined whether reassessment proceedings were valid when approval was obtained from an incorrect authority. The Court he...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that deduction claimed by the assessee under section 80G of the Income Tax Act cannot be denied merely on the gro...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that reopening beyond three years requires escaped income in the form of an asset. Since bogus purchases are rev...
Company Law : NFRA issues order penalizing CA Pawan Jain and Mis Kumar Jain & Associates for lapses in issuing reports under Income Tax Act for ...
Income Tax : Notification No. 8/2020-Income-Tax- CBDT has notified Other electronic modes by inserting New Income TAx Rule 6ABBA. It also amend...
Income Tax : Rule 19AB. Form of report for claiming deduction under section 80JJAA. Report of an accountant which is required to be furnished b...
ITAT ruled that deduction under Section 80JJAA could not be claimed where the business was acquired through amalgamation. The Tribunal held that transfer of assets, liabilities, and business operations constituted business reorganisation under the Act.
ITAT Hyderabad held that deduction under Section 80JJAA cannot be denied merely because Form No. 10DA was filed late due to technical glitches on the income tax portal. The Tribunal noted that the form was available with CPC before processing the return.
The case examined whether reassessment proceedings were valid when approval was obtained from an incorrect authority. The Court held the sanction invalid as it did not comply with statutory requirements, rendering the reassessment void. The ruling highlights strict adherence to approval hierarchy in reopening cases.
ITAT Mumbai held that deduction claimed by the assessee under section 80G of the Income Tax Act cannot be denied merely on the ground that the payment also formed part of CSR expenditure under the Companies Act.
The Tribunal held that reopening beyond three years requires escaped income in the form of an asset. Since bogus purchases are revenue items, the reassessment was declared invalid.
ITAT Mumbai held that deduction under Section 80JJAA cannot be allowed when not claimed in the original return of income. Section 80A(5) bars such belated claims raised for the first time before appellate authorities.
The Tribunal ruled that once the Assessing Officer scrutinized the Section 10AA claim and R&D allocation, revision cannot be invoked. Section 263 cannot be used to re-examine issues already verified during assessment.
The PCIT questioned deduction under Section 80JJAA and CSR expenses but failed to record specific findings. The Tribunal held that absence of independent verification and reasoning renders the Section 263 order invalid.
The Tribunal held that deduction under Section 80JJAA cannot be denied merely because Form 10DA was accepted late when it was uploaded before the due date and available on record before return processing. The ruling treats delayed acceptance as a procedural lapse, not a substantive default.
The Tribunal held that late filing of Form 10DA is a procedural lapse and cannot justify denial of deduction when substantive conditions of Section 80JJAA are fulfilled. Deduction was directed to be allowed as the form was filed before return processing.
