Income Tax : Explore Section 80JJAA of Income Tax Act, encouraging job creation in India. Learn about conditions, deductions, and benefits for ...
Income Tax : Learn about Deduction u/s 80JJAA: Who's eligible, how much is allowed, and what it means for additional employee costs. Expert ins...
Income Tax : Learn about tax deductions for new employee costs under section 80JJAA of the Income-tax Act, its eligibility criteria, and practi...
Finance : A company opting for special rate taxation under section 115BAA and 115BAB of the Act are exempt from paying MAT. Further, a compa...
Income Tax : Explore Section 80JJA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, offering deductions for businesses engaged in collecting and processing biodegr...
Income Tax : During the course of the survey operation, evidences of tax evasion have been gathered regarding wrongful claims of deduction u/s ...
Goods and Services Tax : Currently, a deduction of 30% is allowed in addition to normal deduction of 100% in respect of emoluments paid to eligible new emp...
Income Tax : The case examined whether reassessment proceedings were valid when approval was obtained from an incorrect authority. The Court he...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that deduction claimed by the assessee under section 80G of the Income Tax Act cannot be denied merely on the gro...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that reopening beyond three years requires escaped income in the form of an asset. Since bogus purchases are rev...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that deduction under Section 80JJAA cannot be allowed when not claimed in the original return of income. Section ...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that once the Assessing Officer scrutinized the Section 10AA claim and R&D allocation, revision cannot be invok...
Company Law : NFRA issues order penalizing CA Pawan Jain and Mis Kumar Jain & Associates for lapses in issuing reports under Income Tax Act for ...
Income Tax : Notification No. 8/2020-Income-Tax- CBDT has notified Other electronic modes by inserting New Income TAx Rule 6ABBA. It also amend...
Income Tax : Rule 19AB. Form of report for claiming deduction under section 80JJAA. Report of an accountant which is required to be furnished b...
Denial of the 15% rate through summary processing was held invalid. Eligibility under section 115BAB requires examination and hearing, not mechanical CPC adjustments.
Mumbai ITAT ruled that expenses covered by a binding APA cannot be revisited under section 37 on a “need or benefit” test. Reopening settled transfer pricing issues would defeat the statutory purpose of APA.
The issue was whether the entire Section 80JJAA deduction could be rejected when some employees failed the 240-day condition. The Tribunal held that only ineligible employees’ costs can be disallowed, not the whole claim.
The ITAT held that a deduction under section 80JJAA cannot be denied merely because Form 10DA was partially invisible on the tax portal. The issue was remanded for limited verification now that the complete form is available.
The Tribunal held that once CPC allowed the 80JJAA deduction through a subsequent Section 154 order, the earlier rectification appeal no longer survived. The appeal was dismissed as academic, with a clarification that no extra deduction beyond what CPC allowed could be granted.
The PCIT held the AO’s assessment under section 143(3) as erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue, directing fresh verification of various deductions. The assessee argued all claims were correctly examined, questioning the jurisdiction of section 263.
ITAT Delhi ruled that validly filed Form 10-IC ensures eligibility for Section 115BAA concessional tax rate. Key takeaway: timely filing secures lower corporate tax in subsequent years.
The High Court found no mistake apparent on record to warrant rectification under Section 254, holding that the Tribunal’s decision to uphold the Section 80JJA deduction was neither perverse nor erroneous. The ruling clarifies that Section 254 cannot be used to re-argue the quantum or correctness of a deduction, especially one accepted historically.
The ITAT ruled that CSR expenditure, though disallowed as a business expense, qualifies for deduction under Section 80G if paid to approved entities. The Tribunal directed the AO to verify the donations and allow the 80G claim, rejecting the argument that a mandatory statutory expense cannot be a donation.
The ITAT deleted transfer pricing adjustments for Advertisement, Marketing, and Sales Promotion (AMP) expenses, confirming no international transaction existed with the AE. The ruling held that the Bright Line Test (BLT) is invalid and that since the entity-level TNMM was accepted, no separate AMP adjustment was permissible.
