Income Tax : The removal of the provision means companies and investors are no longer taxed on share premiums exceeding fair market value, crea...
Income Tax : This explains how fair market value governs taxation under multiple provisions including gifts, ESOPs, and slump sales. It highlig...
Income Tax : Courts hold that one-time alimony is a capital receipt arising from extinguishment of rights and not taxable. The ruling clarifies...
Income Tax : The article explains how violating the twin conditions under Section 50C(2) can block valuation relief and trigger taxation on hig...
Income Tax : Overview of income taxed under other sources, including dividends, winnings, interest, deemed income, forfeited advances, family p...
Income Tax : Finance Bill 2024 proposes the sunset of Section 56(2)(viib) from April 2025, eliminating the tax on shares issued above face valu...
Income Tax : Amendment to section 56(2)(viib) of Act extending the applicability of section to issue of shares to non-residents has been made a...
Income Tax : CBDT proposes changes to Rule 11UA in respect of ANGEL TAX- Also proposes to notify Excluded Entities In the Finance Act, 2023, ...
Income Tax : IMB Certificate of Eligible Business is not a pre-requisite to avail the benefits of non-application of the provisions of clause (...
Income Tax : Representation for widening the scope of benefit in case of difference in agreement price and Circle Rate of property is upto 20 p...
Income Tax : Tribunal ruled that objections relating to defective title, encroachments, and legal disputes require proper valuation examination...
Income Tax : Tribunal ruled that future projections under DCF method cannot be tested solely against later actual financial performance. It obs...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court held that grants disbursed by a statutory corporation formed part of its core business functions and qualified a...
Income Tax : Madras High Court held that time-share membership fees could not be fully taxed in the year of receipt since the assessee had cont...
Income Tax : Mumbai ITAT held that Section 56(2)(x) applies to purchase of MHADA leasehold property rights despite reliance on Section 50C ruli...
Income Tax : Notification regarding Income-tax Act Section 56(2)(viib) and assessment of Startup Companies. Clarifications for assessing recogn...
Income Tax : CBDT) amends Income Tax Rule 11UA regarding valuation of unquoted equity shares for tax purposes. Learn about changes in this amen...
Income Tax : Details of Sixteenth Amendment to Income Tax Rules (2023) on computation of income chargeable under life insurance policies as per...
Income Tax : In the Finance Act, 2023, an amendment was introduced in this provision to bring the consideration received from non-residents wit...
Income Tax : CBDT issued Notification No. 29/2023- Income-Tax specifying certain classes of persons for the purpose of sub-clause (ii) of th...
Bombay High Court held that combine reading of section 56 and 54(1) of the CGST Act states that interest @9% is payable when amount is not refunded within 60 days from the date of the order passed by the First Authority.
TAT Mumbai holds that under Section 56(2)(viib), an assessee may adopt DCF or NAV method, and AO cannot substitute valuation with own estimate.
ITAT Nagpur dismisses revenue appeals against Maharashtra Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd, affirming its entitlement to Section 80P deductions on interest income from nominal members and bank deposits, distinguishing the Supreme Court’s Totgars’ Co-operative Sales Society Ltd ruling.
ITAT Nagpur rules Aditya Urban Co-operative Credit Society’s FDR interest is eligible for 80P deduction, distinguishing it from surplus fund cases.
ITAT Pune held that interest income earned by cooperative society on deposits made out of surplus funds with cooperative banks qualifies for deduction under the provisions of section 80P(2)(a)(i). Accordingly, appeal of assessee allowed.
Madras High Court held that adjusting entire demand raised against refund due even during pendency of appeal is without jurisdiction. Accordingly, department directed to refund balance amount with interest.
Bombay High Court held that the entire amounts of insurance claim received for death of horses is to be treated as capital receipt governed only by provisions of Section 45(1) of the Income Tax Act. Hence, the same is not chargeable to tax. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
Gujarat High Court held that interest from co-operative bank is eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act as Cooperative bank is a Cooperative society registered under the Gujarat State Cooperative Societies Act. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
ITAT Mumbai rules 10% tolerance limit under Income Tax Act’s Section 56(2)(x) applies retrospectively, cutting addition in NRB Developers’ property valuation case.
Ahmedabad ITAT rules against Section 56(2)(x) addition for Deepakkumar Chandulal Shah, citing a title dispute that justified a lower sale price and a stamp duty value difference within the 5% threshold.
