#section 271(1)(c)
Log in to FollowLatest section 271(1)(c) updates, provisions, case laws, compliance requirements, tax implications and expert analysis under Income-tax law on TaxGuru.

Mere non-allowability of claim not sufficient to impose penalty U/s. 271(1)(c)

No penalty for Bona fide belief that capital loss was not required to be considered U/s. 10(38)

Deletion of Penalty in case of Bonafide belief supported by Factual Circumstances & Decision

No Penalty for claim which was allowed at one Stage and disallowed later on

Penalty cannot be levied merely for non-challenge of addition by assessee in appeal

Deferral of depreciation doesn’t Result in Income Concealment

Concealment has to be checked with reference to return filed U/. 153A

Penalty proceedings liable to be quashed for Inconsistency in recording of satisfaction and levy of penalty

Penalty cannot be levied in respect of an addition not having been made in quantum assessment

Penalty cannot be levied on a basis other than what it was in Quantum Appeal

No Penalty- When deeming provisions are applied for assessing income

Mere Rejection of a Claim would not attract Penalty

Initiation of Penalty Proceeding U/s. 271(1)(c) in absence of clear finding is invalid

No penalty for claim of depreciation at higher rate on UID Kit under bonafide belief
Explore the latest section 271(1)(c) updates on TaxGuru, including relevant Income-tax Act provisions, rules, notifications, circulars, judicial decisions and compliance guidance. The coverage highlights important tax positions, procedural requirements, assessments, deductions, penalties and litigation developments to help taxpayers and professionals understand the practical implications of changes in income-tax law.
