Finance : Explore the recent amendment to Section 43B of the Income Tax Act aimed at bolstering the financial well-being of MSMEs through ti...
Income Tax : Learn how recent tax code amendments (Section 43B(h)) impact businesses' deductions for Micro and Small Enterprise (MSE) payments....
Income Tax : Explore the impact of Finance Act, 2023, on MSME payment enforcement under section 43B(h) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Understand ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Income Tax : Section 22 of the Income tax Act, 1961 is the charging section for head Income from House Property. As per this section, the asses...
Income Tax : Bombay Chartered Accountants' Society has made a Representation on 'Suggestions for Amendments in the Income Tax Act', on 24th May...
Income Tax : This is a new clause inserted by the Central Board of Direct Taxes through its Notification No. 36/2009 dated 13-4-2009, in the Fo...
Finance : Actor Emraan Hashmi, who was refused an NOC to buy a flat in Nibbana housing society at Pali Hill allegedly because he was a Musli...
Income Tax : The Mumbai ITAT reaffirmed that lease rentals from SEZ and IT Parks along with amenities are taxable as business income. The rulin...
Fema / RBI : The Tribunal ruled that transactions predating the alleged crime cannot be treated as proceeds of crime without a clear link. It s...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that unfinished properties classified as work-in-progress cannot be subjected to notional rent under section 23....
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that negligence on part of bank in presentation of cheque within the validity period of cheque leads to ‘defi...
Corporate Law : The dispute concerned whether courts could revisit the validity of an arbitration clause after appointing an arbitrator. The Supre...
Corporate Law : Discover the latest MSME policy urging MSEs to include EM numbers on documents for better identification and compliance with incom...
ITAT Delhi directed the AO to compute Annual Letting Value (ALV) only for the portion of the house property actually rented out (third/fourth floors). Taxing the entire property based on assumptions, ignoring the owner’s self-occupation, was held to be unjustified.
Where the property was not actually let out, and was treated as self-occupied property, in case of vacant property, the annual value under section 23(1)(a) must be determined on the basis of the Municipal Rateable Value and not market rent.
Chhattisgarh High Court held that addition on account of unaccounted sales based on estimated production yield in complete absence of any adverse material is rightly deleted. Accordingly, substantial question is answered in favour of assessee.
Benami Act was intentionally drafted with a very broad and inclusive definition of property to ensure that all forms of assets, including cash, could be covered. A person could not be treated as a benamidar if they neither possess the property nor claim ownership of it; A property was considered benami when the purported real owner denies their ownership of it.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that in case of bulk liquid cargo imports measurement in tanks on shore into which such cargo is pumped from the tanker is to be considered as basis for levy of customs duty.
Assessee’s remedy lied in recovering the amounts wrongly disbursed through the liquidation process, with the liquidator assisting in such recovery. Upon full satisfaction of the 1st Respondent’s dues, the attachment should stand vacated.
Chhattisgarh High Court held that addition towards unaccounted sales based on estimated production yield is baseless and without any evidence/ material and accordingly is not sustainable in law. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
Bombay High Court held that if municipal rateable value doesn’t depict correct annual value, AO can make independent enquiry under section 23(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act and determine the sum which the property is reasonably expected to fetch for purpose of determining annual value u/s. 22.
NCLAT Delhi held that no authorized correspondence brought on record which states that there was agreement between appellant and corporate debtor to cost incurred by appellant would be settled against license fee payable to Corporate Debtor. Thus, argument of appellant rejected.
Delhi High Court upheld the attachment order under PMLA in view of appellant’s criminal and appellant’s failure to discharge the burden of proving the facts in support of his claim that the attached properties are untainted and not obtained directly or indirectly from criminal activity.
