#Section 148
Log in to FollowLatest Section 148 updates, provisions, case laws, compliance requirements, tax implications and expert analysis under Income-tax law on TaxGuru.

Order passed by CIT(A) without considering submission not sustainable: ITAT Ahmedabad

Assessment Ignoring Indexed Cost of Acquisition Set Aside: Karnataka HC

Addition to items not forming part of reassessment not sustainable: ITAT Kolkata

Reopening of assessment beyond period stipulated u/s. 149(1) not permissible: Delhi HC

Issuance of notice mandatory before an adverse conclusion arrived in assessment order: Madras HC

Each and every addition cannot be base for levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c): ITAT Surat

Adoption of section 50C justified on difference in sale consideration in sale deed and stamp value adopted by officer

Reopening bad-in-law since AO unaware about exact nature of income which escaped assessment

Initiation of proceedings u/s. 148 based on material found during search invalid: ITAT Delhi

ITAT Delhi remands Matter as CIT(A) Failed to Examine Section 148 Jurisdiction Validity

Reassessment Based on Insight Portal Info Must Be Under Sections 147/148 if Section 153C Jurisdictional Conditions Are Not Met

Notice issued u/s. 148 after period of six years for AY 2015-16 is barred by limitation: ITAT Mumbai

Reassessment was valid as Section 147 And 153C could be applied interchangeably

Stay granted on payment of 10% of tax demand since department failed to furnish appropriate proof of alleged demand
Explore the latest Section 148 updates on TaxGuru, including relevant Income-tax Act provisions, rules, notifications, circulars, judicial decisions and compliance guidance. The coverage highlights important tax positions, procedural requirements, assessments, deductions, penalties and litigation developments to help taxpayers and professionals understand the practical implications of changes in income-tax law.
