Income Tax : Learn the updated provisions governing rectification, assessments, reassessments, and appeals under the Income-tax Act. This guide...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that penalty under Section 270A cannot be levied merely because income was estimated after rejection of books. Si...
Income Tax : The Income Tax Department explains how faceless assessments under Section 144B operate through the e-Filing portal without requiri...
Income Tax : The guide explains faceless assessments, appeals, penalties, rectification requests, and demand responses under the Income-tax Act...
Income Tax : Courts have held that non-compliance with mandatory procedures under Section 144B renders faceless assessment orders void. The rul...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : Lucknow CA Tax Practicioners Association has made a Representation to FM for Extension of Time Limit for Assessment cases time bar...
Income Tax : The Kerala High Court, today admitted a batch of Writ Petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Faceless Assessment...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai remanded the case to examine whether Section 56(2)(x) applied based on the agreement date and to consider refund of ex...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted a Section 69 addition after finding documentary evidence established joint ownership, source of funds, and ear...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata condoned appeal delay, set aside the CIT(A)'s order, and remanded the assessment for fresh adjudication after grantin...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai quashed a Section 148 notice issued after the limitation under the first proviso to Section 149, holding the reassessm...
Income Tax : The High Court held that an assessment order passed without issuing a show cause notice detailing the proposed additions violated ...
Income Tax : CBDT issues guidelines for IT verification under Section 144B(5), detailing circumstances for digital and physical checks, effecti...
Income Tax : In pursuance of sub-section (3) of section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the fo...
Income Tax : Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Assessment Unit (AU), Verification Unit (VU), Technical Unit (TU) and Review Unit (RU) unde...
Income Tax : Roll out of first phase of changes in ITBA functionalities for Faceless Assessment due to amendments in Section 144B by Finance Ac...
Income Tax : National Faceless Penalty Centre, in accordance with the guidelines issued by the Board, may,–– (a) in a case where imposit...
The Jharkhand High Court has set aside a reassessment order against Anvari Khatun, citing the absence of a mandatory Section 148A notice. The case is remanded for fresh consideration with proper procedure.
The Calcutta High Court dismissed an appeal by Mukul Mahanta challenging an income tax assessment, directing the petitioner to file a statutory appeal within 30 days.
Calcutta High Court dismisses challenge against a Section 144B tax order, directing Ayashree Finvest to use available statutory appeal remedies despite accountant’s failure.
Calcutta High Court rejects Prasanta Sarkar’s writ challenging a 2022 income tax assessment, citing existing statutory appeal and unexplained filing delay.
ITAT Mumbai rules 10% tolerance limit under Income Tax Act’s Section 56(2)(x) applies retrospectively, cutting addition in NRB Developers’ property valuation case.
Pune Zilha Madhyawarti Sahakari Vs PCIT (ITAT Pune) ITAT Pune held that revisionary order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act is liable to be quashed as AO conducted detailed enquiry and after proper application of mind has taken one of the view legally permissible and concluded the assessment. Accordingly, appeal allowed. Facts- The […]
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal sets aside PCIT’s revisionary order against Synwave Industries, ruling original assessment not erroneous.
ITAT Delhi quashed a tax assessment against Adobe Systems India P. Ltd., ruling it time-barred. The court highlighted the Assessing Officer’s failure to adhere to the statutory deadline post-DRP directions.
ITAT Mumbai sets aside reassessment for advocate Nilanjana Arvinder Singh (AY 2013-14, 2014-15), ruling Section 148 notices time-barred. Decision follows Supreme Court’s Ashish Agarwal and Rajeev Bansal rulings on reassessment limitation.
ITAT Raipur cancels reassessment for Vinay Agrawal (AY 2014-15 & 2015-16) due to time-barred Section 148 notices. Decision relies on Supreme Court rulings in Ashish Agarwal and Rajeev Bansal.
