Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ratna Kumari Koppisetty Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ratna Kumari Koppisetty Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam) ITAT Visakhapatnam held that confirmation of addition by CIT(A) due to non-appearance by assessee. Accordingly, matter remanded back with direction to give one more opportunity of being heard. Facts- The assessee is an individual, engaged in the business as Kerosene dealers in Rajahmundry. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny under CASS “Limited Category” to verify the sources for “Cash deposits during demonetisation period”. AO observed that assessee could not produce details relating to the basis for arriving at the in...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930