Case Law Details
Case Name : Ratna Kumari Koppisetty Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Visakhapatnam
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Ratna Kumari Koppisetty Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that confirmation of addition by CIT(A) due to non-appearance by assessee. Accordingly, matter remanded back with direction to give one more opportunity of being heard.
Facts- The assessee is an individual, engaged in the business as Kerosene dealers in Rajahmundry. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny under CASS “Limited Category” to verify the sources for “Cash deposits during demonetisation period”. AO observed that assessee could not produce details relating
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.