Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ratna Kumari Koppisetty Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ratna Kumari Koppisetty Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

ITAT Visakhapatnam held that confirmation of addition by CIT(A) due to non-appearance by assessee. Accordingly, matter remanded back with direction to give one more opportunity of being heard.

Facts- The assessee is an individual, engaged in the business as Kerosene dealers in Rajahmundry. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny under CASS “Limited Category” to verify the sources for “Cash deposits during demonetisation period”. AO observed that assessee could not produce details relating

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31