Income Tax : This analysis explains how Parliament designed Sections 11 to 13 to ensure that tax-free income is ultimately used for charitable ...
Income Tax : This analysis explains how charitable and religious trusts qualify for exemption under Sections 11 to 13 of the Income-tax Act. It...
Income Tax : The document highlights situations where exemptions under Sections 11 and 12 can be withdrawn, including benefits provided to inte...
Income Tax : Understand the taxation of trusts in India, covering registered and unregistered trusts. Learn about relevant sections, exemptions...
Income Tax : Shalki Bansal Charitable/religious trusts are the trusts which are formed with an objective of providing relief to poor, education...
Income Tax : Having regard to the gravity of the allegations, the ongoing investigation, the requirement of further probe into digital and fina...
Fema / RBI : The Karnataka High Court upheld the Appellate Tribunal's finding that the respondents satisfied the definition of person resident ...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court held that grants disbursed by a statutory corporation formed part of its core business functions and qualified a...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT held that before the amendment effective from 01.04.2015, exemption under Section 54 could be claimed for investment in...
Corporate Law : The Tribunal admitted the voluntary insolvency application after examining financial statements, bank records, and other documents...
Delhi High Court granted bail granted to Chartered Accountant [CA] of entity found involved in money-laundering. Notably, bail is granted since trial in the present complaint case is yet to commence and would take some time to conclude.
By an order dated 06.08.2024, the Commercial Court rejected the application filed by the appellant seeking exemption from complying with the mandatory provisions of Section 12-A of the Act, 2015.
NCLAT Chennai held that initiation of the IRP proceeding u/s. 95 of Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against personal guarantor upheld as no principle of natural justice has been violated, and that the Resolution Professional has given sufficient opportunities.
Kerala High Court directs CBI investigation into the allegations of amassment of wealth disproportionate to his known sources of income against Chief Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister of Kerala.
NCLAT Chennai held that post completion of liquidation process and property of Corporate Debtor is handed over to Successful Auction Purchaser, order u/s. 33(2) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, directing liquidation of corporate debtor’s cannot be revoked.
Supreme Court held that that the preliminary inquiry is not mandatory under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 when the secret information itself discloses the commission of offences. Accordingly, appeal is allowed.
NCLAT Delhi held that when the debt invoking the guarantee falls between the 10A period application u/s. 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is barred by limitation. Accordingly, order rejecting application upheld.
In the year 1998, respondent no.1 was appointed as an Assistant Engineer in Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited. Later, he was promoted to the post of Executive Engineer in Bangalore Electricity Supply Corporation.
Supreme Court held that in disciplinary proceedings, the Disciplinary Authority is not required to be recorded detailed reasons in the order imposing punishment if he accepts the findings recorded by the Enquiry Officer.
Madras High Court held that Section 10-A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 cannot be extended to cases where default continued beyond moratorium period. Hence, application under section 7 for initiation of CIRP acceptable.
