ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored bad debt, TDS/VAT disallowance, Section 80G and Section 270A issues for fresh verification by the Assessin...
Income Tax : ITAT Lucknow restored ad hoc expense disallowance for fresh examination and observed GST and TDS late fee is compensatory in natur...
Income Tax : ITAT Raipur deleted a Section 68 addition, holding that genuine share transactions cannot be treated as bogus without evidence lin...
Income Tax : ITAT Raipur held that departmental allocation of appeals cannot deny adjudication of a Section 115BAB claim and restored the matte...
Income Tax : ITAT Raipur held that CIT(A) must first decide the validity of reassessment proceedings before remanding the matter to the Assessi...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
ITAT Mumbai held that addition is unjustified and liable to be deleted since adjustment was made in between interest paid and interest received thus the entire adjustment had no tax effect i.e. it is tax neutral.
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), New Delhi [CIT(E)] dated 28.06.2023 for cancellation of registration granted u/s 12A and u/s 12AB(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).
ITAT Chennai held that liability to deduct Tax Deduction at Source [TDS] arise only on the amount of actual payment and not on the provision made. Accordingly, TDS liability reduced to that extent and appeal partly allowed.
The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad, dated 20.08.2024, denying grant of approval u/s. 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
On hearing arguments from the both parties ITAT find some force in the arguments of the assessee. It is an admitted fact that the two concerns namely M/s. Ashoka Builders and Developers and Ashoka Engineering Co. are not related parties.
The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance in both years, primarily on the basis that the genuineness of the loans had not been established, and therefore, the interest paid on such loans could not be allowed.
AO observed that a perusal of the books of account (specifically cash book) of the companies, revealed that an amount of Rs.75 lacs and Rs.25 lacs respectively were given by both companies on imprest account to the assessee.
ITAT Pune held that addition towards short term capital gain based on unregistered agreement cannot be sustained since revenue has not brought any evidence on record that possession of property is actually handed over to the purchaser.
Post completion of assessment, information was received from DDIT(Inv.) Unit-5(2), Mumbai that the share of Gemstone Investment Ltd. was a penny stock and assessee was a beneficiary from trading of the above shares.
ITAT Jaipur upholds reassessment in Akshat Loyalka vs ITO but sends Rs. 12.3L cash deposit issue (Sec 69A) back to CIT(A) for fresh review of evidence.
