Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Kanchan Markhedkar (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Kanchan Markhedkar (ITAT Mumbai) The Mumbai ITAT upheld deletion of additions exceeding ₹10.57 crore made under section 56(2)(vii)(c), holding that for AYs 2015-16 and 2016-17, the Assessing Officer could not adopt a “look-through” approach by valuing underlying subsidiary companies instead of the shares actually purchased by the assessee. The Revenue alleged that the assessee and family members had acquired control of companies having huge share premium and assets through intermediary holding companies at nominal value, thereby indirectly acquiring underlying shares far below fa...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930