Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

No Service of 143(1) Intimation = No Delay in Appeal – ITAT Revives TDS Credit Claim After 15 Years

Case Law Details

Case Name
Executors of Shri Ramanlal Jagjivan Gokal Vs Additional/ DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2009-10
Advertisement Executors of Shri Ramanlal Jagjivan Gokal Vs Additional/DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The Mumbai ITAT held that where an assessee was never served with the intimation under section 143(1), the limitation period for filing appeal cannot start merely from the date of processing of return. The Tribunal observed that the assessee became aware of the outstanding demand only after receipt of a section 245 adjustment order proposing set-off of refund against old tax demand. The assessee discovered that while processing the return for AY 2009-10, the department had granted TDS credit of only ₹...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,842

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *