Case Law Details
Case Name : Executors of Shri Ramanlal Jagjivan Gokal Vs Additional/ DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Executors of Shri Ramanlal Jagjivan Gokal Vs Additional/DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
The Mumbai ITAT held that where an assessee was never served with the intimation under section 143(1), the limitation period for filing appeal cannot start merely from the date of processing of return. The Tribunal observed that the assessee became aware of the outstanding demand only after receipt of a section 245 adjustment order proposing set-off of refund against old tax demand.
The assessee discovered that while processing the return for AY 2009-10, the department had granted TDS credit of only ₹23,501 against to...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

