ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that non-specification of the precise statutory charge under sections 270A(2) and 270A(9) violated principles o...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT held that institutions engaged in preservation of environment fall under a specific charitable limb under Section 2...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the Section 54F claim after noting that medical issues and portal difficulties prevented timely filing of ...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that the limitation period for appeal commenced only when the assessee first received the ITBA screenshot revea...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that a genuine share transaction resulting in a short-term loss cannot automatically be treated as a make-belie...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted additions exceeding ₹10.57 crore made under section 56(2)(vii)(c) after finding that the Assessing Officer w...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that additions proposed by CPC under Section 143(1)(a) ceased to survive after the Assessing Officer deleted th...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that an assessee following mercantile accounting must offer interest income to tax on accrual basis, irrespecti...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
ITAT Nagpur ruled in favor of Panchmurti Education Society, allowing exemption under Sections 11 & 12 of the IT Act despite delayed return filing.
ITAT Mumbai invalidates reassessment in Ramlal G Suthar vs. ITO due to improper approval under Section 151(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Read the full summary.
ITAT Mumbai ruled on TVF Fund Ltd’s appeal regarding tax loss set-off under DTAA. Key issues include carry-forward losses, taxability, and judicial precedents.
ITAT Bangalore upheld CIT(A)’s decision, ruling that interconnect charges paid to A1 Telekom Austria are not taxable as royalty under the Income Tax Act or DTAA.
Kedar Jagdish Mankar Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) Adv. Sachin P. Kumar successfully represented his client in Foreign Tax Credit dispute before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pune where the client’s Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) and Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) claims were initially disallowed. The client was working in one of the reputed multi-national company […]
ITAT Panaji ruled in favor of Ganga Suresh Rathod, setting aside NFAC’s order after her video hearing request was denied, citing a breach of natural justice.
ITAT Bangalore sets aside CIT(A) order, allowing an apartment owners association a second chance due to a technical issue that delayed their appeal filing.
ITAT deletes the Rs.6 lakh addition made for unexplained cash found during a search, considering family savings and past declarations.
ITAT Surat quashes CIT(A) order for not considering assessee’s submissions, directing the AO to reassess the case with due opportunity for the assessee.
The assessee is into development and construction of a project. The case was selected for scrutiny and AO issued notices u/s 142(1) and 143(2) of the Act, calling for certain details.
