ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that non-specification of the precise statutory charge under sections 270A(2) and 270A(9) violated principles o...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT held that institutions engaged in preservation of environment fall under a specific charitable limb under Section 2...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the Section 54F claim after noting that medical issues and portal difficulties prevented timely filing of ...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi ruled that reimbursement of software costs to foreign AEs on a cost-to-cost basis could not be treated as a profit-...
Income Tax : The Tribunal upheld tax addition where agricultural land was acquired below stamp duty valuation and DVO-determined fair market va...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that reassessment under Section 147 was invalid as the Assessing Officer failed to show independent applicatio...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that cash deposits during demonetization could not be treated as unexplained income since the amounts were re...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that revision under section 263 was not sustainable where the Assessing Officer had already conducted extensive v...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
ITAT Chennai restricts income addition to 25% of unexplained cash deposit, as assessee failed to establish source of funds during demonetization.
ITAT Delhi deletes business expense and Section 14A disallowances for NDTV Networks, remits director pay issue to AO.
Ahmedabad ITAT rules cash deposits by Amul parlour owner explained by sales, deletes ₹27 lakh addition under Section 69A.
ITAT Ahmedabad remands Rs. 18.47 Cr addition for fresh adjudication, citing invalid assessment order issued in the name of a deceased person.
ITAT Ahmedabad upholds PCIT’s revision order, citing AO’s failure to properly examine Rs. 1.27 Cr deposits in a co-operative society account.
Hyderabad ITAT sends Thirupathi Rao Naineni’s appeal against Rs 4.73 crore capital gains disallowance back to CIT(A) for fresh hearing.
ITAT Mumbai directs AO to verify long-term capital loss after CIT(A) incorrectly noted Rs. 16.89 lakhs instead of Rs. 16.89 crores.
ITAT Rajkot sets aside CIT(A)’s ex parte penalty orders against Sunita Ashokabhai Sharma due to incorrect email service by tax department.
ITAT Mumbai holds flat received by illegal occupant as non-taxable capital receipt, reversing additions made under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) and denial of 54F deduction.
ITAT Pune directs CIT(Exemption) to reconsider Shaan Education Society’s tax exemption denial, citing a lack of proper hearing.
