ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that non-specification of the precise statutory charge under sections 270A(2) and 270A(9) violated principles o...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT held that institutions engaged in preservation of environment fall under a specific charitable limb under Section 2...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the Section 54F claim after noting that medical issues and portal difficulties prevented timely filing of ...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that reassessment under Section 147 was invalid as the Assessing Officer failed to show independent applicatio...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that cash deposits during demonetization could not be treated as unexplained income since the amounts were re...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that revision under section 263 was not sustainable where the Assessing Officer had already conducted extensive v...
Income Tax : ITAT Nagpur held that nominal donations received in small amounts could not be treated as non-voluntary contributions merely becau...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted the addition under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) after holding that a 2.3% variation between agreement value and stamp...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
The ITAT Ahmedabad dismissed an appeal from Goldmine Commodities Pvt. Ltd. for being defective. The court found the grounds of appeal to be verbose, argumentative, and containing irrelevant allegations, failing to comply with legal requirements.
ITAT Kolkata ruled that a reassessment is invalid if no addition is made on the original reason for reopening the case, as the foundation for the reassessment collapses.
The ITAT Kolkata restored an appeal, granting an assessee a fresh opportunity to submit evidence after the previous appeal was dismissed due to non-compliance.
ITAT Ahmedabad deleted an income addition and penalty on a taxpayer, accepting her explanation that cash deposits came from her husband and brother.
The ITAT Delhi deleted income additions on alleged bogus loans and donations, ruling that a defective sanction for reopening an assessment beyond four years invalidates the entire proceeding.
ITAT Delhi deleted a ₹10.75 crore addition on old unsecured loans, ruling that tax authorities cannot tax existing liabilities as fresh income without evidence of bogus transactions.
The ITAT Kolkata deleted an addition under Section 69 and a tax addition under Section 56(2), ruling that a taxpayer’s salary account was a valid source for property investment.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that bad debts written off as irrecoverable in books is enough and it is not necessary to demonstrate that a debt has become bad. Accordingly, addition on account of bad debts liable to be deleted.
The ITAT Ahmedabad accepted a developer’s project completion accounting method, deleting a Rs. 2.24 crore addition made by the AO for alleged profit suppression.
ITAT Chandigarh directs the Assessing Officer to verify if the assessee paid a portion of GST before the return due date to allow deduction under Section 43B.
