Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dinesh Kumar Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dinesh Kumar Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Code Name “Thekedar” Not Enough – Presumption Under 292C Applies Only to searched assessee; No Crroboration, No Addition – ITAT Relieves Assessee from Hazir Johri Trap A search u/s 132 was conducted in Jindal Bullion Ltd. (JBL) Group on 05.01.2017. Digital data was seized from software “Hazir Johri”, which revealed parallel books recording both accounted & unaccounted transactions. In the seized data, a ledger with code name “Thekedar” was linked by AO to Assesse Dinesh Kumar Jain. Based on this, AO initiated proceedings u/s 153C, mak...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930