ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that non-specification of the precise statutory charge under sections 270A(2) and 270A(9) violated principles o...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT held that institutions engaged in preservation of environment fall under a specific charitable limb under Section 2...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the Section 54F claim after noting that medical issues and portal difficulties prevented timely filing of ...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that reassessment under Section 147 was invalid as the Assessing Officer failed to show independent applicatio...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that cash deposits during demonetization could not be treated as unexplained income since the amounts were re...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that revision under section 263 was not sustainable where the Assessing Officer had already conducted extensive v...
Income Tax : ITAT Nagpur held that nominal donations received in small amounts could not be treated as non-voluntary contributions merely becau...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted the addition under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) after holding that a 2.3% variation between agreement value and stamp...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
ITAT Jaipur rules reassessment notice issued post-TOLA limit invalid in Sanskriti Build-Dev vs ITO. Proceedings declared time-barred under Rajeev Bansal ruling.
Summary of Deepika Garg vs. ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) for AY 2017-18. The ruling deletes a Rs. 24 lakh addition for alleged bogus cash sales, upholding the assessee’s audited books and documented transactions.
The ITAT Ahmedabad directed the CIT(E) to grant registration to Hatkeshwar Mahadev Trust, ruling that caste-based objects alone are not a violation without proof of applied income.
ITAT Mumbai held that identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of loan from M/s Sai Traders were proved through PAN, ITRs, banking trail, interest with TDS, and full repayment. Section 68 addition of ₹1 crore was unsustainable.
Tribunal ruled that contributions to workers’ educational institutions under NCWA are statutory obligations and not voluntary expenses. Disallowance under Section 40A(9) was deleted. Issues on TDS, Section 43B and double disallowances remanded to AO for verification.
ITAT Jaipur deletes ₹6.26 Cr. addition u/s 68, stating it would be double taxation. Tribunal also rules that the CIT(A) exceeded jurisdiction by remanding the case for verification of already submitted documents.
ITAT Hyderabad upholds PCIT’s Section 263 order as AO failed to verify 99% subcontract expenses; reassessment directed for unverified GST-linked subcontract claims.
The ITAT Raipur has set aside an addition under Section 68 on a salaried employee’s demonetization cash deposit, citing a lack of evidence by the CIT(A).
ITAT Hyderabad partly allows Revenue’s appeal in Net Net Ventures case. Rs.7 Cr addition deleted; Rs.1.47 Cr and Rs.1.73 Cr issues remanded for verification.
The ITAT Pune restores a case for fresh assessment after an updated tax return was filed with errors by a consultant, ruling that a taxpayer cannot be taxed on income they did not earn.
