Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nagabhushanam & Co. Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nagabhushanam & Co. Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) ITAT Hyderabad Upholds PCIT’s Section 263 Revision – 99% Subcontracting Expenses Not Verified by AO- GST Statement Exposed Bogus Subcontracts Background Assessee filed ROI (30.10.2018) declaring ₹3.94 Cr income. Flagged under risk management – AO noted ITC claim of ₹1.12 Cr based on invoices from 3 subcontractors (GJS Infratech, Sri Laxmi Constructions, Roll-on Projects) without actual supply. AO reopened u/s 147; reassessment completed on 15.02.2023 without any addition. PCIT invoked s.263 (04.03.2025), holding AO failed to verify gen...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930