Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Radhakishan Beniwal Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Radhakishan Beniwal Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur) ITAT Jaipur Deletes ₹6.26 Cr. Addition u/s 68 on Sub-Contract Receipts – Double Taxation Avoided Background Assessee, a civil contractor (AA Class, PWD registered), executed NHAI project work as an approved sub-contractor of Dineshchandra R. Agrawal Infracon Pvt. Ltd. (DRAIPL). During reassessment, AO alleged that assessee was a beneficiary of bogus sub-contracts unearthed in DRAIPL search. AO held that ₹6,26,68,011/- credited in assessee’s books was unexplained u/s 68, despite TDS being deducted u/s 194C & income shown in P&L. CIT(A...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031