CA, CS, CMA : A comprehensive guide covering 175 legal compliances for July 2026 under FEMA, Income Tax, GST, SEBI, Companies Act, Labour Laws, ...
Income Tax : The Income-tax Act does not prescribe a single definition of "relative" for all purposes. Different provisions such as Sections 13...
Income Tax : Understand when 1% TDS applies on purchase of immovable property under Section 194-IA. Learn the Rs. 50 lakh threshold, compliance...
Income Tax : This guide explains when NRIs should use Form 128 and when payers should use Form 129 to reduce or eliminate excess TDS. It also c...
Income Tax : The article argues that Section 58(3) of the Income-tax Act, 2025 does not independently mandate books of account or tax audit for...
Income Tax : The issue was complexity in the existing tax law. It was clarified that the new Act simplifies structure by reducing sections and ...
Income Tax : This webinar breaks down the major structural and conceptual changes introduced in the new Income Tax Act, 2025. It helps professi...
Income Tax : The government informed Parliament that taxpayer-specific details of income tax searches cannot be disclosed due to confidentialit...
Income Tax : The Government clarified that the new income tax search provision does not expand powers or permit AI-based digital surveillance, ...
Income Tax : The representation highlights large-scale pendency and administrative bottlenecks under Sections 12AB and 80G, urging immediate re...
Income Tax : Madras HC set aside cognizance under the Income-tax Act, holding Section 223(1) BNSS mandates hearing the accused before cognizanc...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai quashed reassessment after finding no Section 143(2) notice and that the AO issued a final order disguised as a draft ...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC quashed a Section 148 notice, holding that a seized inquiry register without a live nexus to the assessee cannot justif...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC quashed Section 148 reassessment as it was issued beyond Section 149 limitation, holding Section 152(3) applies to sear...
Income Tax : Madras HC held that merely issuing a corrigendum acknowledging the return did not rectify the defective assessment process and ord...
Income Tax : CBDT FAQs clarify Section 536 transition rules for summons, searches, recovery, penalties, pending 12AB/80G approvals and LDC/NDC ...
Income Tax : CBDT has approved a scientific research institution under the Income-tax Act, 2025 for tax years 2026-27 to 2030-31. The notificat...
Income Tax : CBDT has approved the University of Hyderabad for scientific research under Section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 2025. The approval i...
Income Tax : The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) approved the company under Section 35(1)(iia) for scientific research ...
Income Tax : The government enforced a tax collection assistance agreement with Japan effective from 8 July 2025. The notification enables cros...
Explore the detailed analysis of Chetak Enterprises Ltd. Vs ACIT Rajasthan High Court judgment on reopening assessments under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act. Understand the implications and legal nuances.
Introduction to Judicial Interpretation of Income Tax Law in India The judicial elucidation of income tax legislation in India plays a pivotal role in shaping the contours of the nation’s taxation regime. Given tax statutes’ intricate and often convoluted nature, the judiciary’s part in expounding and construing these laws becomes indispensable. Over the years, Indian […]
Read the detailed analysis of the ITAT Delhi verdict in Pooja Mittal vs PCIT case, addressing the issues of Long Term Capital Gain and supervisory jurisdiction under Section 263.
The court highlighted that jurisdiction under Section 263 should not be exercised at the instance of the assessing officer. This precedent reinforced the Tribunal’s decision to set aside the PCIT’s order in Reeta Lakhmani’s case.
Explore the Calcutta High Court judgment in PCIT Vs Kaushalya Dealers Pvt Ltd under Income Tax Act 1961, focusing on Section 263 jurisdictional issues and assessment validity.
Assessee has placed sufficient documents and materials on record to prove identity and creditworthiness of shareholders and genuineness of transaction of receiving share capital and share premium, invoking provisions of Section 68 of was not justified
Explore ITAT Kolkata’s ruling on no addition for share capital & premium from group companies with common directors/shareholders. Detailed analysis & conclusion
Mere reliance on statements without corroborative evidence and denying cross-examination rights cannot justify additions for share capital and share premium under Section 68
Read the full judgment of Kerala High Court on Mammed Komban vs. National Faceless Assessment Center. Analysis of assessment order violations under Income Tax Act sec. 147.
Read about Bombay High Courts decision upholding ITAT’s order directing Vodafone India to deposit Rs.230 crores to stay income tax demands, analyzing the legal implications and challenges faced.
