CA, CS, CMA : A comprehensive guide covering 175 legal compliances for July 2026 under FEMA, Income Tax, GST, SEBI, Companies Act, Labour Laws, ...
Income Tax : The Income-tax Act does not prescribe a single definition of "relative" for all purposes. Different provisions such as Sections 13...
Income Tax : Understand when 1% TDS applies on purchase of immovable property under Section 194-IA. Learn the Rs. 50 lakh threshold, compliance...
Income Tax : This guide explains when NRIs should use Form 128 and when payers should use Form 129 to reduce or eliminate excess TDS. It also c...
Income Tax : The article argues that Section 58(3) of the Income-tax Act, 2025 does not independently mandate books of account or tax audit for...
Income Tax : The issue was complexity in the existing tax law. It was clarified that the new Act simplifies structure by reducing sections and ...
Income Tax : This webinar breaks down the major structural and conceptual changes introduced in the new Income Tax Act, 2025. It helps professi...
Income Tax : The government informed Parliament that taxpayer-specific details of income tax searches cannot be disclosed due to confidentialit...
Income Tax : The Government clarified that the new income tax search provision does not expand powers or permit AI-based digital surveillance, ...
Income Tax : The representation highlights large-scale pendency and administrative bottlenecks under Sections 12AB and 80G, urging immediate re...
Income Tax : Madras HC set aside cognizance under the Income-tax Act, holding Section 223(1) BNSS mandates hearing the accused before cognizanc...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai quashed reassessment after finding no Section 143(2) notice and that the AO issued a final order disguised as a draft ...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC quashed a Section 148 notice, holding that a seized inquiry register without a live nexus to the assessee cannot justif...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC quashed Section 148 reassessment as it was issued beyond Section 149 limitation, holding Section 152(3) applies to sear...
Income Tax : Madras HC held that merely issuing a corrigendum acknowledging the return did not rectify the defective assessment process and ord...
Income Tax : CBDT has approved a scientific research institution under the Income-tax Act, 2025 for tax years 2026-27 to 2030-31. The notificat...
Income Tax : CBDT has approved the University of Hyderabad for scientific research under Section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 2025. The approval i...
Income Tax : The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) approved the company under Section 35(1)(iia) for scientific research ...
Income Tax : The government enforced a tax collection assistance agreement with Japan effective from 8 July 2025. The notification enables cros...
Income Tax : CBDT updated DIN rules to align with new provisions introduced under the Finance Act, 2026. The circular mandates DIN for most tax...
During the course of assessement proceedings, AO noted that the assessee has earned interest income on fixed deposits made with banks which has been included in the business income while computing deduction u/s 10AA of the Act.
Delhi High Court quashes tax notices against R.C. Jewellers, rules Section 153C proceedings require incriminating material linking seized items to assessee’s income.
CBDT specifies Indian Railway Finance Corporation Ltd.’s Ten Year Zero Coupon Bond under Income-tax Act Section 2(48), detailing features and March 2027 issue deadline.
Pune ITAT rules Foreign Tax Credit cannot be denied solely due to delayed filing of Form 67. Case remitted to AO for re-examination on merits.
Bombay High Court allows a company to file delayed income tax returns for AYs 2017-18 and 2018-19 due to hardship, conditional on not claiming interest on refunds.
Ahmedabad ITAT sends back tax case to CIT(A) after significant additions for cash deposits and unsecured loans were deleted without obtaining the Assessing Officer’s remand report.
Bombay High Court rules rectification under Section 154 is valid even with pending appeal, if the issue hasn’t been considered and decided by CIT(A).
ITAT Chandigarh held that deduction u/s 54B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is not admissible if the new capital asset i.e. agriculture land is purchased in the name of wife of the assessee. Accordingly, appeal of assessee partly allowed.
ITAT Ahmedabad allows appeal of Sorathiya Darji Kedvani Mandal, ruling surcharge not applicable on trust’s income below Rs. 50 lakhs, citing precedents.
Delhi High Court sets aside AO’s order that ignored CIT(A) ruling on PF/ESI deposit disallowance, citing lack of jurisdiction to review appellate order.
