CA, CS, CMA : A comprehensive guide covering 175 legal compliances for July 2026 under FEMA, Income Tax, GST, SEBI, Companies Act, Labour Laws, ...
Income Tax : The Income-tax Act does not prescribe a single definition of "relative" for all purposes. Different provisions such as Sections 13...
Income Tax : Understand when 1% TDS applies on purchase of immovable property under Section 194-IA. Learn the Rs. 50 lakh threshold, compliance...
Income Tax : This guide explains when NRIs should use Form 128 and when payers should use Form 129 to reduce or eliminate excess TDS. It also c...
Income Tax : The article argues that Section 58(3) of the Income-tax Act, 2025 does not independently mandate books of account or tax audit for...
Income Tax : The issue was complexity in the existing tax law. It was clarified that the new Act simplifies structure by reducing sections and ...
Income Tax : This webinar breaks down the major structural and conceptual changes introduced in the new Income Tax Act, 2025. It helps professi...
Income Tax : The government informed Parliament that taxpayer-specific details of income tax searches cannot be disclosed due to confidentialit...
Income Tax : The Government clarified that the new income tax search provision does not expand powers or permit AI-based digital surveillance, ...
Income Tax : The representation highlights large-scale pendency and administrative bottlenecks under Sections 12AB and 80G, urging immediate re...
Income Tax : Madras HC set aside cognizance under the Income-tax Act, holding Section 223(1) BNSS mandates hearing the accused before cognizanc...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai quashed reassessment after finding no Section 143(2) notice and that the AO issued a final order disguised as a draft ...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC quashed a Section 148 notice, holding that a seized inquiry register without a live nexus to the assessee cannot justif...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC quashed Section 148 reassessment as it was issued beyond Section 149 limitation, holding Section 152(3) applies to sear...
Income Tax : Madras HC held that merely issuing a corrigendum acknowledging the return did not rectify the defective assessment process and ord...
Income Tax : CBDT has approved a scientific research institution under the Income-tax Act, 2025 for tax years 2026-27 to 2030-31. The notificat...
Income Tax : CBDT has approved the University of Hyderabad for scientific research under Section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 2025. The approval i...
Income Tax : The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) approved the company under Section 35(1)(iia) for scientific research ...
Income Tax : The government enforced a tax collection assistance agreement with Japan effective from 8 July 2025. The notification enables cros...
Income Tax : CBDT updated DIN rules to align with new provisions introduced under the Finance Act, 2026. The circular mandates DIN for most tax...
Delhi High Court sets aside an income tax notice demanding management fees from Idemia Identity And Security India, ruling it violated Section 149(1)(a) due to limitation.
Calcutta High Court dismisses Income Tax Department’s appeal in a Rs. 71 lakh penny stock loss case, affirming no evidence of assessee’s involvement in price rigging.
Delhi High Court rules that the limitation period under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act begins from the date the Assessing Officer receives the seized documents, quashing an assessment notice for AY 2015-16.
Madras High Court sets aside an assessment order, granting a taxpayer opportunity to respond to notices after their authorized representative’s hospitalization for surgery.
Madras HC dismisses plea against IT case transfer from Theni to Kochi Central Circle, citing Rs 50 lakh seizure in Kerala search & mandatory CBDT guidelines.
ITAT Delhi quashes reassessment order against Allauddin Qureshi, ruling S.148 notice served on old email invalid when updated info was available. Follows Delhi HC precedent.
Kolkata ITAT voids tax reassessment for AY 2017-18, finding reasons for reopening vague & based on borrowed satisfaction, citing Delhi HC precedent.
Mumbai ITAT rules contractual penalties for road firm are business expenses, not disallowed legal infractions under Section 37(1), citing judicial precedents.
ITAT Chennai upholds disallowances for Devcare Solutions: Cash payments exceeding limit disallowed u/s 40A(3), technical fees disallowed for lack of proof.
ITAT Pune held that in respect of unabated assessment, no addition can be made by AO in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search under section 132 of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, order set aside and appeal allowed.
