Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that a 21-year-old woman cannot be compelled to return home or marry against her wishes, treating residence, marria...
Corporate Law : The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that judicial officers cannot be intimidated for delivering judgments since every judicial orde...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Corporate Law : The Bombay High Court held that merely organising protests or morchas against government decisions cannot justify externment. It r...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court held that an unnatural death in police custody attracts constitutional liability under Article 21, even if ca...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC has directed CBDT to ensure that there is a mandatory one-month gap between date for furnishing tax audit reports (unde...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court granted a one-month extension for filing TARs under Section 44AB for AY 2025-26, citing delayed audit utility...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court is hearing a petition from the Chartered Accountants Association regarding persistent glitches on the new I...
Income Tax : Bombay HC quashed Section 148 notices, holding that search-based material required proceedings under Sections 153A/153C, not Secti...
Income Tax : Karnataka HC held Section 147 reopening invalid where seized material from a third-party search required proceedings under Section...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC quashed reassessment and penalty orders issued against a deceased person, holding proceedings concluded against a dead ...
Corporate Law : Andhra Pradesh HC held that AI-generated fake citations alone do not invalidate a judicial order if the correct legal principles a...
Income Tax : Bombay HC quashed Section 148 reopening for AY 2013-14, holding Section 43CA was inapplicable and stamp duty valuation alone could...
Income Tax : The Court held that membership cannot be granted where the underlying flats do not exist and are merely refuge areas. It ruled tha...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Delhi HC rules courts must focus on specific allegations against accused in bail decisions, not just FIR details.
Writ petition against CGST Rule 96(10) omission impact on IGST refund order. Court examines rule deletion effect on pending GST proceedings.
Punjab and Haryana High Court rejects Sapphire Foods’ petition, stating company misinterpreted tax orders and must face DGGI probe on TRAN-1.
Madras High Court sets aside GST assessment order for Ramesh Agency, citing parallel proceedings and directing tax authorities to conduct fresh adjudication.
Bombay High Court tells Payu Payments to respond to DGGI tax show cause notice, reinforcing legal principle of exhausting alternate remedies first.
Gauhati HC affirms Central Govt’s power to notify mandatory BIS quality standards as a policy decision in Century Plyboards case.
Delhi High Court directs directors penalised in GST evasion case to use appellate remedies, clarifies ‘any person’ liability under CGST Act.
Unless there were exceptional reasons like violation of the principles of natural justice or such other exceptional reasons, a challenge against an order under section 148A ought not to be entertained by the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Kerala High Court held that 100% Export Oriented Unit i.e. EOU is itself a customs bonded unit and hence no reason exists to deny permission to the petitioner to remove the cashew kernels covered by Bill of Entry to be re-processed in its own customs bonded premises.
The right to correct mistakes in the nature of clerical or arithmetical error is a right that flows from the right to do business and should not be denied unless there is a good justification and reason to deny benefit of correction.
