Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : The Allahabad High Court held that a three-month gap between the alleged harassment and the student’s suicide broke the necessar...
Goods and Services Tax : The Gujarat High Court held that supplier tax payment remains mandatory for ITC claims under Section 16(2)(c). However, ITC cann...
Income Tax : The article explains how the High Court held that corporate guarantee fees do not qualify as Fees for Technical Services under the...
Goods and Services Tax : The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that refund arising from an unconstitutional GST levy carries a constitutional right to interes...
Corporate Law : The Allahabad High Court observed that criminal case delays are caused not only by judicial officers but also by inadequate infras...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC has directed CBDT to ensure that there is a mandatory one-month gap between date for furnishing tax audit reports (unde...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court granted a one-month extension for filing TARs under Section 44AB for AY 2025-26, citing delayed audit utility...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court is hearing a petition from the Chartered Accountants Association regarding persistent glitches on the new I...
Corporate Law : SC clarifies limits of High Court's writ powers in IBC cases and recognises Indian CIRP as foreign main proceeding in cross-border...
Corporate Law : Madras High Court held that the Central Board of Trustees under the EPF Act can challenge Tribunal orders under Article 226 since ...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court held that investment-linked tax incentives under the 2012 industrial policy could continue unless specifically with...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court set aside a GST demand order after finding that the hearing notice was received by the taxpayer only after the hear...
Goods and Services Tax : Andhra Pradesh High Court held that a single GST assessment order covering multiple financial years violated Sections 73 and 74 of...
Goods and Services Tax : Uttarakhand High Court directed refund of GST deducted on sale of rejected wheat and paddy seeds after noting that the goods were ...
Income Tax : The Court held that membership cannot be granted where the underlying flats do not exist and are merely refuge areas. It ruled tha...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Bombay High Court dismisses Sawai Fragrances’ writ plea over GST order, citing alternate remedy and suppression of facts. Cost of ₹1 lakh imposed.
Delhi High Court criticizes Customs for prolonged detention of export goods, orders provisional release, citing departmental circular.
Assam High Court addresses GST notice validity in DNA Agrotech case, focusing on Section 73 compliance and proper show cause notice issuance.
Bombay High Court quashes income tax notices to Srimani Basu due to improper service from address discrepancy, grants fresh hearing opportunity.
Allahabad High Court sets aside GST order with higher demand than show-cause notice, citing violation of Section 75(7) of the GST Act.
The entire procedure subsequent to obtaining further information, documents or evidence has not been gone through in case of the Petitioner, and straightaway, the impugned assessment has been finalized.
Petitioner in response had made a representation informing the respondent-BDA that, what was offered to him was a full completed apartment and there was no pre-construction agreement between the petitioner and respondent-BDA.
Delhi High Court held that adjustment of refund against outstanding demand not justified on account of an order interdicting coercive action for recovery of dues. Accordingly, petition is allowed and refund amount is directed to be paid.
Bombay High Court permits challenge to 153C jurisdiction, ruling cross-objections not required to support favorable order.
Gujarat High Court dismisses appeal, upholds addition of unexplained cash credit under Section 68, citing lack of genuine transactions.
