Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that judicial officers cannot be intimidated for delivering judgments since every judicial orde...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Corporate Law : The Bombay High Court held that merely organising protests or morchas against government decisions cannot justify externment. It r...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court held that an unnatural death in police custody attracts constitutional liability under Article 21, even if ca...
Income Tax : The Calcutta High Court quashed a Section 143(3) assessment after finding that the assessee was denied a meaningful opportunity of...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC has directed CBDT to ensure that there is a mandatory one-month gap between date for furnishing tax audit reports (unde...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court granted a one-month extension for filing TARs under Section 44AB for AY 2025-26, citing delayed audit utility...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court is hearing a petition from the Chartered Accountants Association regarding persistent glitches on the new I...
Income Tax : Bombay HC quashed Section 148 reopening for AY 2013-14, holding Section 43CA was inapplicable and stamp duty valuation alone could...
Income Tax : Madras HC held Section 153C action must be supported by incriminating material relatable to the relevant assessment year, distingu...
Income Tax : Delhi HC upheld Section 263 revision, holding an unreasoned assessment on subsidy was erroneous, and remanded the issue for fresh ...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras HC set aside a GST assessment passed against a deceased person, holding it non est in law, and permitted legal heirs to res...
Income Tax : Delhi HC held interest on borrowings for strategic shareholding may qualify under Section 36(1)(iii). Matter remanded to AO to ver...
Income Tax : The Court held that membership cannot be granted where the underlying flats do not exist and are merely refuge areas. It ruled tha...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Delhi HC rules writ petitions challenging tax orders are not maintainable if a personal hearing was granted but not availed. Appeal is the proper remedy, with limitation period relaxed.
Madras High Court held that delay of more than 17 years in adjudication of show cause proceeding without justifiable reasons is arbitrary and offending under Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Thus, proceedings are dropped and writ petition is allowed.
Andhra Pradesh High Court sets aside GST assessment order lacking officer’s signature and Document Identification Number (DIN), citing judicial precedents. Case remanded for fresh assessment.
Delhi High Court held that concluded and closed assessments cannot be reopened merely on suspicion. Accordingly, reopening of assessment is liable to be quashed since there is no tangible material that has a live nexus to reason to believe that the income has escaped assessment.
Karnataka High Court held that service of software development to overseas service recipients are that of an independent service provider which qualify as export of services under the service tax provisions and 2(6) of the IGST Act. Accordingly, refund granted and petition allowed.
Himachal Pradesh High Court clarifies that payments made “under protest” against alleged ITC discrepancies do not constitute an admission of GST liability. The Court quashed interest and penalties imposed on Shyama Power India Ltd., directing re-issuance of demand to allow appeal.
The Sikkim High Court’s judgment in SICPA India breathes fresh life into a long-standing debate on the right to claim refunds upon business closure under GST.
The Allahabad High Court granted bail to accused individuals in a GST fake invoice case, citing reliance on confessional statements, lack of conclusive evidence, and trial delays.
The Delhi High Court ruled that parallel GST proceedings are not allowed, citing Section 6(2)(b) of the CGST Act, if the Central GST Department has already adjudicated the matter.
The Kerala High Court ruled that rectification is warranted when the GST Department issues contradictory orders on the same issue, even if the application is via email.
