Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : The Allahabad High Court held that a three-month gap between the alleged harassment and the student’s suicide broke the necessar...
Goods and Services Tax : The Gujarat High Court held that supplier tax payment remains mandatory for ITC claims under Section 16(2)(c). However, ITC cann...
Income Tax : The article explains how the High Court held that corporate guarantee fees do not qualify as Fees for Technical Services under the...
Goods and Services Tax : The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that refund arising from an unconstitutional GST levy carries a constitutional right to interes...
Corporate Law : The Allahabad High Court observed that criminal case delays are caused not only by judicial officers but also by inadequate infras...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC has directed CBDT to ensure that there is a mandatory one-month gap between date for furnishing tax audit reports (unde...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court granted a one-month extension for filing TARs under Section 44AB for AY 2025-26, citing delayed audit utility...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court is hearing a petition from the Chartered Accountants Association regarding persistent glitches on the new I...
Corporate Law : SC clarifies limits of High Court's writ powers in IBC cases and recognises Indian CIRP as foreign main proceeding in cross-border...
Corporate Law : Madras High Court held that the Central Board of Trustees under the EPF Act can challenge Tribunal orders under Article 226 since ...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court held that investment-linked tax incentives under the 2012 industrial policy could continue unless specifically with...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court set aside a GST demand order after finding that the hearing notice was received by the taxpayer only after the hear...
Goods and Services Tax : Andhra Pradesh High Court held that a single GST assessment order covering multiple financial years violated Sections 73 and 74 of...
Goods and Services Tax : Uttarakhand High Court directed refund of GST deducted on sale of rejected wheat and paddy seeds after noting that the goods were ...
Income Tax : The Court held that membership cannot be granted where the underlying flats do not exist and are merely refuge areas. It ruled tha...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Calcutta High Court remands Bajaj Wheels tax case to adjudicating authority for fresh decision, citing appellate order’s lack of explicit directions.
Delhi High Court rules only one pre-deposit needed for GST appeal when tax liability is duplicated across two orders, preventing double payment for the same amount.
Delhi High Court directs GST department to grant personal hearing for registration suspension but limits writ relief for re-inspection, advising assessee to approach adjudicating authority.
The Kerala High Court ruled that GST rectification power under Section 161 isn’t limited to taxpayer requests. Officers can initiate rectification suo motu for errors apparent on record, even if the taxpayer’s formal application is delayed.
The Calcutta High Court set aside orders against Kamdhenu Udyog P Ltd., ruling that a technical error in ITC reversal forms should not override substantive compliance. The company had voluntarily reversed wrongly availed Input Tax Credit.
Raj Kumar Bothra Vs DCIT (Chhattisgarh High Court) AO should not have resorted to section 143(1) (a) and instead could have resorted to section 143 (3): Chhathisgarh HC The Chhattisgarh High Court, in the case of Raj Kumar Bothra vs. DCIT, has ruled that an Assessing Officer (AO) should not have resorted to Section 143(1)(a) […]
All these appeals were filed for AY 1991-92. Appellants were shareholders in the company. Earlier all three share holders were successful before CIT (A). Appeal were filed before tribunal. The sole legal issues that arises relates to the computation of cost of acquisition under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961, an asset distributed on liquidation of the Company, the asset being the immovable property at 552, Mount Road, Madras that belonged to the Company. The appellants had purchased 120 shares of the Company at the rate of Rs.21,000/- per share in the Company. The Company went into voluntary liquidation on 21.05.1990.
Clause (ix) of the Explanation to Section 153B could not be invoked to exclude the period of reference under the Indo-Swiss DTAA, if the reference itself was invalid. Thus, no request could be made by Department for information relating to period prior to 01.04.2011 in terms of the Indo-Swiss DTAA.
Telangana High Court held that law of limitation [Limitation Act, 1963] applies even for claims under the Interest on Delayed Payment to the Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993. Accordingly, instant appeal stands partly allowed.
Orissa High Court rules COVID-19 period extends GST appeal limitation, setting aside rejection based on delay. Directs appeal hearing on merits.
