Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : The Allahabad High Court held that a three-month gap between the alleged harassment and the student’s suicide broke the necessar...
Goods and Services Tax : The Gujarat High Court held that supplier tax payment remains mandatory for ITC claims under Section 16(2)(c). However, ITC cann...
Income Tax : The article explains how the High Court held that corporate guarantee fees do not qualify as Fees for Technical Services under the...
Goods and Services Tax : The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that refund arising from an unconstitutional GST levy carries a constitutional right to interes...
Corporate Law : The Allahabad High Court observed that criminal case delays are caused not only by judicial officers but also by inadequate infras...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC has directed CBDT to ensure that there is a mandatory one-month gap between date for furnishing tax audit reports (unde...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court granted a one-month extension for filing TARs under Section 44AB for AY 2025-26, citing delayed audit utility...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court is hearing a petition from the Chartered Accountants Association regarding persistent glitches on the new I...
Corporate Law : SC clarifies limits of High Court's writ powers in IBC cases and recognises Indian CIRP as foreign main proceeding in cross-border...
Corporate Law : Madras High Court held that the Central Board of Trustees under the EPF Act can challenge Tribunal orders under Article 226 since ...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court held that investment-linked tax incentives under the 2012 industrial policy could continue unless specifically with...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court set aside a GST demand order after finding that the hearing notice was received by the taxpayer only after the hear...
Goods and Services Tax : Andhra Pradesh High Court held that a single GST assessment order covering multiple financial years violated Sections 73 and 74 of...
Goods and Services Tax : Uttarakhand High Court directed refund of GST deducted on sale of rejected wheat and paddy seeds after noting that the goods were ...
Income Tax : The Court held that membership cannot be granted where the underlying flats do not exist and are merely refuge areas. It ruled tha...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Madras High Court held that the export incentive cannot be denied for technical and venial breach of provisions of Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act [CGST Act]. Accordingly, petition allowed.
Delhi High Court examines constitutional validity of DVAT Act Section 9(2)(g), impacting Input Tax Credit claims due to selling dealer’s tax deposit failures.
Delhi High Court rules Section 9(2)(g) of DVAT Act unconstitutional, asserting it violates rights by denying input tax credit to buyers for seller’s tax defaults.
Delhi High Court reviews the constitutionality of DVAT Act Section 9(2)(g), impacting Input Tax Credit for purchasers due to seller’s tax defaults. Examines impact on bona fide dealers.
Delhi High Court sets aside tax notices, ruling on Section 9(2)(g) of DVAT Act. Upholds right to Input Tax Credit for bona fide purchasers.
Delhi High Court sets aside Section 9(2)(g) of the DVAT Act, ruling it violates Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) by denying input tax credit to bona fide purchasers for seller’s default.
Delhi High Court held that since twin conditions required under section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 [PMLA] has been satisfied, the application for grant of anticipatory bail allowed.
Delhi High Court ruled that bona fide buyers can’t be denied Input Tax Credit (ITC) for a seller’s failure to deposit VAT, reading down Section 9(2)(g) of DVAT Act.
Delhi High Court rules Section 9(2)(g) of DVAT Act is arbitrary for penalizing bona fide buyers for seller’s tax default. ITC is protected.
Himachal Pradesh High Court held that rejection of GST appeal without assigning specific reasons for the rejection thereof is not sustainable in law. Accordingly, matter restored back to Appellate Authority for denovo proceedings.
