To facilitate foreign investment into the country a number of steps have been taken by Government of India in the past. Setting up an Authority for Advance Rulings (Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax) to give binding rulings, in advance, on Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax matters pertaining to an investment venture in India is one such measure. The legal provisions of Advance Rulings were introduced through the Finance Acts of 1998, 1999 and 2003.
Income Tax : Only specified applicants such as non-residents, certain residents, and public sector companies can apply. The ruling clarifies ta...
Goods and Services Tax : The authority held that oxygen supply through installed infrastructure is a composite supply of goods. The key takeaway is that pr...
Income Tax : Understand when and how to file an advance ruling application under the Income-tax Act, 2025. The update clarifies eligibility, do...
Goods and Services Tax : Recent AAR rulings have raised questions on whether ITC on imports is subject to Section 16(4). While one ruling applies the time ...
Goods and Services Tax : The issue was whether foreign patent filing fees attract GST. The ruling confirms such payments are taxable as import of services ...
Income Tax : From October 2024, applicants can withdraw advance ruling requests pending with the Board for Advance Rulings by October 31. Final...
Income Tax : This handbook aims to provide general guidance on the scheme of Advance Rulings under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act). I...
Income Tax : CBDT launches Boards for Advance Rulings in Delhi & Mumbai, providing tax clarity to investors and entities. Learn more about this...
Goods and Services Tax : New functionality to search for GST Advance Ruling Orders issued by Authority / Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling on GST Por...
Goods and Services Tax : Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) constituted under the provisions of a SGST/ UTGST Act, in terms of the provisions of Section 96...
Goods and Services Tax : The Kerala AAR held that advance ruling applications cannot be based on hypothetical scenarios or academic questions. The Authorit...
Goods and Services Tax : The Kerala AAR held that medicines, consumables, room rent, and ancillary services provided during inpatient treatment form part o...
Goods and Services Tax : Kerala AAR held that used gunny bags sold after cattle feed manufacturing are reusable packing bags under HSN 6305 and not scrap. ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Kerala AAR rejected an advance ruling application after noting that the issue of GST applicability on member transactions had ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Authority ruled that the President and Members of the statutory temple board are not “directors” under GST notifications. ...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the constitution & members of the Advance Ruling Authority under Maharashtra VAT Act 2002. Detailed analysis on its implic...
Goods and Services Tax : Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Authority makes changes in its lineup, appointing Shri. Ajaykumar Vaman Bonde as a member of Ad...
Income Tax : CBDT notifies e-advance rulings (Amendment) Scheme, 2023 which amend e-advance rulings Scheme, 2022. Amendments are related to Boa...
Goods and Services Tax : The Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, has issued Notification No. 02/2023 – Union Territory Tax on May 25, 2023. T...
Income Tax : F No. 189/3/2022-ITA-I Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue (Central Board of Direct Taxes) North Block, ...
In a recent ruling by AAR Rajasthan in case of M/S Pink City Steel Rolling Mills Pvt Ltd., issue of GST applicability on delayed payment of interest was addressed.
Explore implications of GST on liquidated damages, trade settlements, and contract breaches in light of South India Krishna Oil & Fact Pvt Ltd case.
Punjab AAR rules that purchases of raw cotton from Kacha Arhtia by Bansal Industries attract GST under reverse charge mechanism as per Section 9(3) of CGST/PGST Act 2017, aligning with Notification No. 13/2017 and No. 43/2017.
M/s International Traders, engaged in import of dry fruits from Pakistan, sought an advance ruling on applicable tax rate for supply of dry dates. However, their application was rejected by Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) in Punjab due to non-compliance with prescribed procedures.
Advance Ruling Authority in Punjab rejected the application submitted by Global Foods due to non-compliance with the prescribed fee requirements.
Advance Ruling Authority in Punjab rejected the application submitted by Paryag Trade Links due to non-compliance with the prescribed format and fee requirements. The applicant, a Works Contractor, sought clarification on the type of GST to be charged in a repair work contract with a company not registered in Punjab.
Advance Ruling Authority in Punjab rejected application submitted by Nidhi Sharma (Zed Enterprises) due to incomplete fee payment. Applicant had only deposited Rs. 5,000 under SGST while filing Advance Ruling Application, falling short of prescribed fee requirement under CGST Act.
GST Advance ruling application rejected as applicant had only deposited Rs. 5,000 under SGST and not under CGST, failing to fulfill prescribed fee requirement under CGST Act.
Non-payment of requisite fee can lead to rejection of GST Advance Ruling application without addressing substantive questions raised by applicant.
Neither the applicant has submitted his application for Advance Ruling in prescribed format i.e. ARA-01, nor has deposited the requisite fee for filling Advance Ruling application. Thus, the application is hereby filed without any ruling.
