Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Nasa Brain & Spine Centre (GST AAR Punjab)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Nasa Brain & Spine Centre (GST AAR Punjab)

1. Background: The Advance Ruling Authority in Punjab rejected the application submitted by Nidhi Sharma (Zed Enterprises) due to incomplete fee payment. The applicant had only deposited Rs. 5,000 under SGST while filing the Advance Ruling Application, falling short of the prescribed fee requirement under the CGST Act.

2. Proceedings: The applicant, Nidhi Sharma (Zed Enterprises), submitted an applicat

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31