Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hitendrakumar Chimanlal Patel Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Hitendrakumar Chimanlal Patel Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) Partial Relief in Jewellery Addition — Benefit Allowed for Relatives’ Jewellery During Search; ₹10 Lakh Addition Deleted  The Ahmedabad Bench of the ITAT partly allowed the appeals of a husband and wife arising from a common search under section 132, relating to addition for unexplained jewellery found at their residence and bank lockers. During search, 2,668 grams of jewellery was found. After allowing relief under CBDT Instruction No. 1916, the AO treated 1,211.7 grams (₹35.74 lakh) as unexplained and added the same 50% substant...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Mens Rea, No Misconduct: ICAI Clears CA in Alleged Bribery Trap Case CA Not Liable for Client’s Bogus Entries: ICAI Clears Accountant with No Certification Role Suspicion ≠ Proof: ICAI Clears CA in Alleged Multi-Bank Loan Fraud Case Delayed Retraction Backfires: ICAI Finds CA Guilty in Bogus Donation Tax Evasion Scheme Admission Seals Fate: ICAI Reprimands CA in Bogus Political Donation Scam View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930