Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Surjit Kaur Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Surjit Kaur Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)

ITAT Chandigarh Deletes Section 271D Penalty for Cash Sale Consideration Received at Registration

The Chandigarh Bench (SMC) of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the appeal of the assessee for AY 2017-18 and deleted penalty of ₹7.41 lakh levied under section 271D for alleged violation of Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

IBC Section 7: SC Holds CIRP Admission Mandatory Once Debt & Default Proved; Society Intervention Denied ITAT Ahmedabad Deletes On-Money Additions; Loose Papers Insufficient Entire Bogus Purchase Disallowance Rejected When Books Not Rejected: ITAT Pune Appeal Cannot Be Dismissed for Typographical Error in Form 35: ITAT Hyderabad Agricultural Income Estimation Scaled Down: ITAT Rajkot Restricts Addition to ₹50,000 on Ad-hoc Basis View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031