This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Technical Error in Schedule BP Cannot Justify Retaining 143(1) Adjustment 143(3) After Scrutiny
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Standard Castings Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2018-19
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Standard Castings Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Section 143(1) Intimation Merges into 143(3) Scrutiny—AO Must Rectify Apparent Punching Error & Cannot Retain CPC Adjustment; CIT(A)’s ‘Not Maintainable’ View Reversed
The Assessee filed return for AY 2018-19 declaring NIL income under normal provisions and ₹5.57 crore as book profit u/s 115JB. CPC processed the return u/s 143(1) and computed income at ₹7,08,56,368, because an apparent punching mistake occurred—long-term & short-term capital gains of ₹12.07 crore were wrongly entered in Schedule BP...






