Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hitesh Ugamraj Mehta Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2023-24
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Hitesh Ugamraj Mehta Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Ad-Hoc 10% Disallowance Deleted: ITAT Rules Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof in Labour Charges  The appeal before the Tribunal concerned disallowance of labour charges in a jewellery manufacturing and trading business for Assessment Year 2023–24. The assessee was engaged in manufacturing and trading of gold jewellery and had declared total income of ₹23,13,320. During scrutiny, the Assessing Officer (AO) observed that the gross profit was low and examined various expenses, particularly labour charges amounting to ₹4,92,34,244. Out of this, paymen...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Addition on Loans From Wife and Company Deleted: Delhi ITAT Section 271D Penalty Quashed as Six-Month Limitation Expired: Bengaluru ITAT Mumbai ITAT Deletes Section 69A Addition as CHA Customs Duty Collections Are Fiduciary Receipts Mumbai ITAT Deletes Section 69A Addition for Recorded Jewellery Sales During Demonetisation Mumbai ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition as Marriage Gifts and Past Savings Explain Cash Deposits View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031